An Approach to Determine Importance Degree of Targets in Customer Collaborative Products Innovation

China Mechanical Engineering ›› 2013, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (16): 2223-2231.

Previous Articles Next Articles

An Approach to Determine Importance Degree of Targets in Customer Collaborative Products Innovation

Ma Jiaqi1;Yang Yu1;Li Fei1;Xie Jianzhong1,2

1.State Key Laboratory of Mechanical Transmission,Chongqing University,Chongqing,
400030
2.Foxconn Technology Group,Shenzhen,Guangdong,518101

Online:2013-08-25 Published:2013-08-23
Supported by:

National Natural Science Foundation of China（No. 71071173）;

Key Technology R&D Program of Chongqing（No. 2010GGB108,2011GGC351）;

Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China（No. 20090191110004）;
Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities( No. CDJZR-10-110012)

客户协同产品创新中目标重要度的确定方法

马家齐1;杨育1;李斐1;谢建中1,2

1.重庆大学机械传动国家重点实验室,重庆,400030
2.富士康科技集团,深圳,518101

基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目（71071173);重庆市科技攻关计划资助项目（2010GGB108,2011GGC351);高等学校博士学科点科研基金资助项目（20090191110004);中央高校基本科研业务费资助项目（CDJZR-10-110012）
National Natural Science Foundation of China（No. 71071173）;

Key Technology R&D Program of Chongqing（No. 2010GGB108,2011GGC351）;

Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China（No. 20090191110004）;
Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities( No. CDJZR-10-110012)

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to solve the problem that importance of targets
was hard to be quantified accurately in customer collaborative products innovation(CCI),an approach to determine the important degree of innovation goals was
proposed.Firstly,a basic structure for target system of CCI was established to certify
integration and system of target.Then,based on combining subjective and objective
methods including AHP and entropy value method,
multi-granularity non-equilibrium semantic treatment method,
a three-stage quantified approach was proposed to calculate and revise the importance
of targets.Finally,the feasibility and effectiveness were verified by a cellphone customer
collaborative innovation example.

Key words: customer collaborative, innovation goal, importance degree, three-stage quantitative analysis

摘要：

为解决客户协同创新中目标重要度难以准确量化的问题,提出了一种创新目标重要度的确定方法。首先,构建了客户协同产品创新目标体系的基本框架,以保证创新目标的整体性与系统性;其次,提出了三阶定量分析方法,该方法融合了AHP与熵值法相结合的主客观赋权法、多粒度非平衡语义处理方法等,对目标重要度进行计算及修订。最后,通过某手机的客户协同创新设计实例验证了该方法的可行性与有效性。


关键词: 客户协同, 创新目标, 重要度, 三阶定量分析

CLC Number:

TP391

MA Jia-Ji-1, YANG Yo-1, LI Fei-1, XIE Jian-Zhong-1, 2. An Approach to Determine Importance Degree of Targets in Customer Collaborative Products Innovation[J]. China Mechanical Engineering, 2013, 24(16): 2223-2231.

马家齐1, 杨育1, 李斐1, 谢建中1, 2. 客户协同产品创新中目标重要度的确定方法[J]. 中国机械工程, 2013, 24(16): 2223-2231.

References

[1]Team Mental Models and Performance: Process, Development and Future Directions [J]. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing, 2007,14 (4) :331-352.
[2]Thomke S H, Hippel E V. Customers as Innova- tors: A New Way to Create Value [J]. Harvard Business Review,2002,80(4) :74-81.
[3]Franke N, Piller F. Value Creation by Toolkits for User Innovation and Design:The Case of the Watch Marke[J]. Journal of Product Innovation, 2004,21 (6) :401-415.
[4]杨育[1],郭波[1],尹胜[1],王伟立[1],张晓冬[1].客户协同创新的内涵与概念框架及其应用研究[J].计算机集成制造系统,2008,14(5):944-950.
[5]刘晓敏[1],檀润华[2],姚立纲[1].产品创新概念设计集成过程模型应用研究[J].机械工程学报,2008,44(9):154-162.
[6]Merrick K E. Case Studies Using Multiuser Virtual Worlds as an Innovative Platform for Collaborative Design[J]. Electronic Journal of Information Tech- nology in Construction, 2011,2 (16) : 165-188.
[7]王小磊[1,2],杨育[1],杨洁[1,3],梁学栋[1],曾强[1].协同产品创新设计中客户知识的识别与应用[J].重庆大学学报：自然科学版,2010(2):51-56.
[8]Chen Liu, Alejandro R S. Customer-driven Product Design and Evaluation Method for Collaborative De- sign Environments[J]. Journal of Intelligent Manu- facturing, 2011,22 .. 751-764.
[9]王小磊[1,2],杨育[1],杨洁[1,3],曾强[1],程博[1].协同产品创新设计中基于层次知识匹配的冲突消解研究[J].中国机械工程,2010(20):2488-2495.
[10]杨洁[1,2],杨育[1],赵川[1],王小磊[1],曾强[1].产品外形设计中客户感性认知模型及应用[J].计算机辅助设计与图形学学报,2010(3):538-544.
[11]Ko Y T,Yang C C,Kuo P H. A Problem-oriented Design Method for Product Innovation[J]. Concur- rent Engineering, 2011, (19) 4 . 335-344.
[12]Saaty T L. Decision- making with the Ahp: Why is the Principal Eigenvector Necessary[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2003,145 ( 1 ) : 85- 91.
[13]李朝玲[1,2],高齐圣[2].质量功能展开中基于二元语义的顾客需求重要度的确定[J].计算机集成制造系统,2009,15(6):1202-1206.
[14]Zhang Zaifang,Chu Xuening. Fuzzy Group Decision -making for Multi-format and Multi-granular- ity Linguistic Judgments in Quality Function De- ployment[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2009,36(5) : 9150-9158.
[15]Zhai L Y,Khoo L P,Zhong Z W. A Rough Set En- hanced Fuzzy Approach to Quality Function De- ployment [J]. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology,2008,37(5) :613-624.
[16]Xu Zeshui. An Interactive Approach to Multiple Attribute Group Decision Making with Multi- Granular Uncertain Linguistic Information [J]. Group Decision and Negotiation, 2009,18 (2) : 119- 145.
[17]陈岩　[1],樊治平　[1],陈侠[1].一种基于不同粒度语言判断矩阵的群决策方法[J].东北大学学报：自然科学版,2007,28(7):1057-1060.
[18]Liu Y, Fan Z P. A Method for Group Decision- making Based on Multi- granularity Uncertain Linguistic Information [J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2010,37 (5) : 4000-4008.
[19]Xu Zeshui. Multiple Attribute Decision Making Based on Different Types of Linguistic Information [J]. Journal of Southeast University: English Edi- tion,2006,22(1) : 134-136.

An Approach to Determine Importance Degree of Targets in Customer Collaborative Products Innovation

客户协同产品创新中目标重要度的确定方法

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 2

Recommended Articles

Metrics

[1]	GENG Jing-Song-1, 2, YANG Yo-1, LIU Ai-Jun-1, TAO Hao-3. Research on Generating Process of Product Innovation Projects Based on QTF in Customer Collaborative Design [J]. China Mechanical Engineering, 2013, 24(15): 2101-2109.
[2]	GENG Jing-Song-1, 2, YANG Yo-1, LIU Ai-Jun-1, TAO Hao-3. Research on Knowledge Sharing for Customer Collaborative Product Innovation Based on Knowledge Grid [J]. China Mechanical Engineering, 2012, 23(23): 2817-2824.