基于混合博弈的产品多学科柔性设计决策

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对产品多学科多目标的设计决策问题，给出了一种融合博弈论和柔性机制进行建模和求解的方法。通过混合博弈来表征学科之间及目标之间的耦合关系,提出了混合博弈模型框架及求解方法。考虑到不确定性和变化的影响，为使产品设计决策具有柔性，引入性能水平满意度函数来柔性表达设计要求，并寻求设计变量的柔性范围解来替代固定值的点解，从而增加产品的柔性；柔性范围解处于可行设计空间内，使各学科性能处于满意水平并靠近期望值，且具有较好的稳定性。利用概率分布对相应的性能变化进行建模，引入设计偏好指数对柔性设计方案进行评价。最后通过减速器算例的设计来验证该方法的可行性和有效性。

关键词: 多学科设计, 柔性决策, 博弈, 偏好指数, 减速器

Abstract: For the problems of multidisciplinary and multiobjective design and decision, a novel method was given using game theory and flexibility mechanism to model and solve the problems. The coupling relations among disciplines or targets were presented by mixed game, and the mixed game model framework and the corresponding solving methods were proposed. Considering the influences of uncertainty and changes, in order to make the design and decision be flexible, the satisfaction function of performance was introduced to express the flexible design requirements, and the flexible range solutions of design variables were sought rather than a point solution to increase product flexibility. The flexible range solutions were in the feasible design spaces, where every discipline's performances were satisfactory and close to the expected values and had good stability. Probabilistic representation was used to model the corresponding design performance changes, and design preference index (DPI) was introduced to evaluate the flexible design. Finally, a gear reducer design example was given to verify the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed method.

Key words: multidisciplinary design, flexibility decision, game, preference index, reducer

中图分类号:

TH122

陈亮;李廖平. 基于混合博弈的产品多学科柔性设计决策[J]. 中国机械工程.

CHEN Liang;LI Liaoping. Multidisciplinary Flexible Design and Decision Based on Mixed Game[J]. China Mechanical Engineering.

参考文献

[1]刘克龙,姚卫星,余雄庆.几种新型多学科设计优化算法及比较[J].计算机集成制造系统,2007,13(2):209-216.
LIU Kelong , YAO Weixing, YU Xiongqing. Some New Algorithms for Multidisciplinary Design Optimization and Their Comparison [J].Computer Integrated Manufacture Systems,2007,13(2):209-216.

[2]HAFTKA R T , SOBIESZCZANSKI-SOBIESKI J, PADULA S L . On Options for Interdisciplinary Analysis and Design Optimization[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization,1992,4(2):65-74.

[3]SELLAR R S, BATILL S M, RENAUD J E.Response Surface Based，Concurrent Subspace Optimization for Multidisciplinary System Design[C]//34th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit.Reno, 1996,AIAA-1996-0714.

[4]SOBIESKI I P, KROO I M. Collaborative Optimization Using Response Surface Estimation[J]. AIAA Journal, 2000,38(10):1931-1938.

[5]马明旭,王承恩,张嘉易，等. 复杂产品多学科设计优化技术[J].机械工程学报,2008,44(6):15-26.
MA Mingxu, WANG Chengen, ZHANG Jiayi,et al.Multidisciplinary Design Optimization for Complex Product Review[J].Journal of Mechanical Engineering,2008,44(6):15-26.

[6]叶国青,姜江,陈森，等.武器装备体系设计问题求解框架与优化方法[J].系统工程与电子技术, 2012，34(11)：2256-2263.
YE Guoqing,JIANG Jiang,CHEN Sen,et al.Design Optimization of Weapon System of Systems Based on Collaborative Multidisciplinary Decision-making[J].System Engineer and Electronics,2012,34(11)：2256-2263.

[7]LEWIS K, MISTREE F. Modeling Interactions in Multidisciplinary Design: a Game Theoretic Approach[J]. AIAA Journal,1997,35(8):1387-1392.

[8]Shun T K. A Game-theoretic Model of Collaboration in Engineering Design[J].Journal of Mechanical Design, 2010,132(5):051005-1-9.

[9]DHINGRA A K, RAO S S. A Cooperative Fuzzy Game Theoretic Approach to Multiple Objective Design Optimization[J].European Journal of Operational Research,1995,83(3):547-567.

[10]LIANG Z X, YAN L, SHANG J Z.Ship Cabin Layout Design Using Game Theory[J]. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 2008,13(4):446-454.

[11]陈加明,宋小文,徐浩.结合模糊聚类和合作竞争博弈的优化方法[J].中国机械工程,2015,26(16):2179-2182.
CHEN Jiaming, SONG Xiaowen, XU Hao.Optimization Method Based on Fuzzy Clustering and Cooperative Competition Game[J]. China Mechanical Engineering,2015,26(16):2179-2182.

[12]郑丞,金隼,来新民，等.基于非合作博弈的公差分配优化[J].机械工程学报,2009,45(10):159-165.
ZHENG Cheng, JIN Sun, LAI Xinmin,et al.Tolerance Allocation Optimization Based on Non-cooperative Game Analysis[J].Journal of Mechanical Engineering,2009,45(10):159-165.

[13]SIMPSON T W, ROSEN D, ALLEN J K, et al. Metrics for Assessing Design Freedom and Information Certainty in the Early Stages of Design[J]. Journal of Mechanical Design, 1998,120(4):628-635.

[14]JOSEPH H S, DANIEL E H, DAVA J N. Flexibility in System Design and Implications for Aerospace Systems[J]. Acta Astronautica,2003,53(12):927-944.

[15]CHEN W, YUAN C. A Probabilistic-based Design Model for Achieving Flexibility in Design[J]. Journal of Mechanical Design,1999,121(1):77-83.

[16]PADULA S L, ALEXANDROV N, GREEN L L. MDO Test Suite at NASA Langley Research Center[C]//Proceedings of the 6th NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization.Bellevue, 1996：AIAA-1996-4028.

[17]王振国,陈小前,罗文彩，等.飞行器多学科设计优化理论与应用研究[M].北京:国防工业出版社,2006.
WANG Zhenguo, CHEN Xiaoqian, LUO Wencai,et al.Research on the Theory and Application of Multidisciplinary Design Optimization of Flight Vehicles[M].Beijing: National Defend Industry Press,2006.

[18]LI X, LIU C, LI W, et al. An Alternative Formulation of Collaborative Optimization Based on Geometric Analysis[J].Journal of Mechanical Design,2011,133(5):623-635.