基于扩散张量偏微分方程的拓扑优化过滤方法

中国机械工程 ›› 2013, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (22): 3057-3061.

基于扩散张量偏微分方程的拓扑优化过滤方法

赵清海1;陈潇凯1;林逸1,2

1.北京理工大学,北京,100081
2.北京汽车研究总院,北京,100021

出版日期:2013-11-25 发布日期:2013-11-29
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(50905017)

Filters in Topology Optimization Based on Diffusion Tensor of Partial Differential Equations

Zhao Qinghai1;Chen Xiaokai1;Lin Yi1,2

1.Beijing Institute of Technology,Beijing,100081
2.Beijing Automotive Technology Center,Beijing,100021

Online:2013-11-25 Published:2013-11-29
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China（No. 50905017）

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为了有效抑制拓扑优化结果中出现的数值不稳定现象,提出了基于扩散张量偏微分方程的初边值模型,考虑Neumann边界条件,实现边界扩展,并采用有限差分法求解。将有限差分模型与拓扑优化循环相融合,分别实现单元密度和目标函数灵敏度的过滤处理。算例验证了方法的有效性与灵活性,结果表明：目标函数灵敏度过滤方法能保持边界清晰度,但需要较多的过滤迭代次数;单元密度过滤方法的计算效率较高,但结果边界模糊。

关键词: 扩散张量, 拓扑优化, 偏微分方程, 数值不稳定现象, 过滤

Abstract:

In order to eliminate numerical instabilities efficiently in topology optimization, an initial-boundary value model of diffusion tensor of partial differential equations was established. Together with Neumann conditions to expand boundary, finite difference method was used to solve the model. The model integrated smoothly into topology optimization circle, and was aimed at element density and objective function sensitivity for filtering operations respectively. At last, the examples checked the effectiveness and flexibility of the two methods. Results illustrate that objective function sensitivity filtering can keep boundary clarity, but needs more filtering iteration number. However element density filtering owns high computational filtering efficiency, but has vague boundary.

Key words: diffusion tensor, topology optimization, partial differential equation, numerical instability, filtering

中图分类号:

TH122

赵清海, 陈潇凯, 林逸, . 基于扩散张量偏微分方程的拓扑优化过滤方法[J]. 中国机械工程, 2013, 24(22): 3057-3061.

Zhao Qinghai, Chen Xiaokai, Lin Yi, . Filters in Topology Optimization Based on Diffusion Tensor of Partial Differential Equations[J]. China Mechanical Engineering, 2013, 24(22): 3057-3061.

参考文献

[1]张喜清, 项昌乐, 刘辉. 多工况下变速箱箱体结构的拓扑优化设计[J]. 中国机械工程, 2011, 22(15): 1779-1783.
[2]Bendsoe M P, Kikuchi N. Generating Optimal Topologies in Structural Design Using a Homogenization Method[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 1988, 71(2): 197-224.
[3]Sigmund O. A New Class of Extremal Composites[J]. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 2000, 48(2): 397-428.
[4]Sethian J A, Wiegmann A. Structural Boundary Design via Level Set and Immersed Interface Methods[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2000, 163(2): 489-528.
[5]Sui Y K, Yang D Q. A New Method for Structural Topological Optimization Based on the Concept of Independent Conlinuous Variables and Smooth Model[J]. Acta Mechanica Sinica, 1998, 14(2): 179-185.
[6]Sigmund O, Petersson J. Numerical Instabilities in Topology Optimization: a Survey on Procedures Dealing with Checkerboards, Mesh-dependencies and Local Minima[J]. Structural Optimization, 1998, 16(1): 68-75.
[7]Sigmund O. A 99 IAne Topology Optimization Code Written in Matlab[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2001, 21(2): 120-127.
[8]左孔天, 王书亭, 陈立平, 等. 拓扑优化中去除数值不稳定性的算法研究[J]. 机械科学与技术, 2005, 24(1): 86-89.
[9]罗震, 陈立平, 张云清, 等. 多工况下连续体结构的多刚度拓扑优化设计和二重敏度过滤技术[J]. 固体力学学报, 2005, 26(1): 29-36.
[10]Kawamoto A, Matsumori T, Yamasaki S, et al. Heaviside Projection Based Topology Optimization by a PDE-filtered Scalar Function[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2011, 44(1): 19-24.
[11]Lazarov B S, Sigmund O. Filters in Topology Optimization Based on Helmholtz--type Differential Equations[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2011, 86(6): 765-781.
[12]Andreassen E, Clausen A, Schevenels M, et al. Efficient Topology Optimization in MATLAB Using 88 lanes of Code[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2011, 43(1): 1-16.
[13]Bendsoe M P, Sigmund O. Topology Optimization Theory, Methods and Application[M]. Berlin: Springer, 2003.

[1]	赵清海1,2;张洪信2;蒋荣超2;华青松1,2;袁林2. 考虑拓扑相关热载荷的散热结构多相材料拓扑优化设计[J]. 中国机械工程, 2020, 31(20): 2403-2411.
[2]	王冠1；张骞2；寇琳媛1；刘志文3；李世康3. 基于混合元胞自动机算法的连续体结构非线性拓扑优化[J]. 中国机械工程, 2020, 31(18): 2161-2173.
[3]	陈涛1;李宁宁1;李卓1;李奇奇1;陈少伟1;张茜2. 侧面柱碰撞条件下电动汽车电池系统结构优化[J]. 中国机械工程, 2020, 31(09): 1021-1030.
[4]	李宇鹏1,2；巴春来1；刘来超3. 采用结构仿生的重型机床立柱的综合优化[J]. 中国机械工程, 2019, 30(13): 1621-1625,1637.
[5]	邹坤;侯亮;卜祥建;方奕凯. 基于工况风险评估的叉车门架多工况拓扑优化[J]. 中国机械工程, 2019, 30(05): 568-577.
[6]	贺红林;夏自强;袁维东. 基于改进优化准则法的自由阻尼结构动力学拓扑优化[J]. 中国机械工程, 2018, 29(13): 1531-1539.
[7]	许小奎;郭宝峰;金淼. 基于对比度增强抑制灰度的改进优化准则法[J]. 中国机械工程, 2017, 28(24): 2944-2948,2956.
[8]	梁明轩1,2,3;李正刚2;唐任仲1;陈立2;黄川2. 基于柔性多体动力学的机械臂结构优化设计[J]. 中国机械工程, 2017, 28(21): 2562-2566.
[9]	房伟1;全书海1;谭保华2,3;冉斌4;王力1;焦亚田1. 汽车尾气热电转换装置电气拓扑结构优化[J]. 中国机械工程, 2017, 28(21): 2620-2626.
[10]	李昂;刘初升. 基于超单元技术的大型复杂结构的拓扑优化设计[J]. 中国机械工程, 2017, 28(20): 2467-2474.
[11]	杨江林1;张诗阳2. 基于非线性拓扑优化的汽车变厚度保险杠耐撞性设计[J]. 中国机械工程, 2017, 28(17): 2109-2114.
[12]	李昂;刘初升. 垃圾压缩站箱体结构的荷载分析及轻量化设计[J]. 中国机械工程, 2017, 28(17): 2124-2130.
[13]	宁晓斌1;刘亚冉1;李颉2;李光3;李佳林3. 基于拓扑优化方法的大型液压挖掘机斗杆新型结构[J]. 中国机械工程, 2017, 28(16): 1936-1942.
[14]	许小奎, 郭宝峰, 金淼. 基于密度体积插值方法的结构拓扑优化[J]. 中国机械工程, 2017, 28(11): 1269-1273.
[15]	邹中妃, 何林, 李家春, 陈跃威. 传热结构摄动敏度分析及动态拓扑优化[J]. 中国机械工程, 2017, 28(10): 1183-1190.