基于对比度增强抑制灰度的改进优化准则法

中国机械工程

基于对比度增强抑制灰度的改进优化准则法

许小奎;郭宝峰;金淼

燕山大学先进锻压成形技术与科学教育部重点实验室，秦皇岛，066004

出版日期:2017-12-25 发布日期:2017-12-21
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(51575474)；
河北省自然科学基金资助项目(E2015203220)
National Natural Science Foundation of China （No. 51575474）
Hebei Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China （No. E2015203220）

A Modified Optimality Criterion Method Based on Contrast Enhancement for Gray Scale Suppression

XU Xiaokui;GUO Baofeng;JIN Miao

Key Laboratory of Advanced Forging & Stamping Technology and Science,Yanshan University,Qinhuangdao,Hebei,066004

Online:2017-12-25 Published:2017-12-21
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China （No. 51575474）
Hebei Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China （No. E2015203220）

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了抑制变密度法拓扑优化结果中的灰度单元，基于对比度增强策略，提出了两种形式的对比度增强算子，引入到优化准则法迭代计算中，对优化准则法进行了改进。对比度增强算子能够拉大单元灰度差别，驱动中间密度向两极进行分化，最终使优化收敛于0/1材料分布状态。采用典型数值算例对该方法进行了验证，计算结果表明，该方法能够得到拓扑结构清晰的优化结果。

关键词: 拓扑优化, 对比度增强, 灰度单元, 优化准则法

Abstract: In order to suppress gray scale elements in density-based topology optimization, two kinds of contrast enhancement operators were proposed based on contrast enhancement strategy and introduced into the iterative calculation to modify the optimality criteria method. The contrast enhancement operator might enlarge the gray scale differences of the elements, drive the intermediate densities to the two ends of the range, and finally make the results convergence to the 0/1 material distribution. The effects of the proposed method were investigated with classical numerical examples. The results show that the optimization results with crisp boundaries are obtained by applying the proposed method.

Key words: topology optimization, contrast enhancement, gray element, optimality criteria method

中图分类号:

TH122

许小奎;郭宝峰;金淼. 基于对比度增强抑制灰度的改进优化准则法[J]. 中国机械工程.

XU Xiaokui;GUO Baofeng;JIN Miao. A Modified Optimality Criterion Method Based on Contrast Enhancement for Gray Scale Suppression[J]. China Mechanical Engineering.

参考文献

[1]BENDSE M P. Optimal Shape Design as a Material Distribution Problem[J]. Structural Optimization, 1989, 1(4): 193-202.
[2]SIGMUND O, PETERSSON J. Numerical Instabilities in Topology Optimization: a Survey on Procedures Dealing with Checkerboards, Mesh-dependencies and Local Minima[J]. Structural Optimization, 1998, 16(1): 68-75.
[3]SIGMUND O. Design of Material Structures Using Topology Optimization[D]. Lyngby: Technical University of Denmark, 1994.
[4]BRUNS T E, TORTORELLI D A. Topology Optimization of Non-linear Elastic Structures and Compliant Mechanisms[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2001, 190(26/27): 3443-3459.
[5]GUEST J K, PRVOST J H, BELYTSCHKO T. Achieving Minimum Length Scale in Topology Optimization Using Nodal Design Variables and Projection Functions[J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2004, 61(2):238-254.
[6]SIGMUND O. Morphology-based Black and White Filters for Topology Optimization[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2007, 33(4): 401-424.
[7]XU S L, CAI Y W, CHENG G D. Volume Preserving Nonlinear Density Filter Based on Heaviside Functions[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2010, 41(4): 495-505.
[8]BORRVALL T, PERTERSSON J. Topology Optimization Using Regularized Intermediate Density Control[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2001, 190(37/38): 4911-4928.
[9]GROENWOLD A A, ETMAN L F P. A Simple Heuristic for Gray-scale Suppression in Optimality Criterion-based Topology Optimization[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2009, 39(2): 217-225.
[10]张志飞, 徐伟, 徐中明, 等. 抑制拓扑优化中灰度单元的双重SIMP方法[J]. 农业机械学报, 2015, 46(11): 405-410.
ZHANG Zhifei, XU Wei, XU Zhongming, et al. Double-SIMP Method for Gray-scale Elements Suppression in Topology Optimization[J]. Transactions of The Chinese Society of Agricultural Machinery, 2015, 46(11): 405-410.
[11]陈垂福, 杨晓翔. 一种考虑密度补偿的变过滤半径敏度过滤方法[J]. 中国机械工程, 2017, 28(6): 669-675.
CHEN Chuifu, YANG Xiaoxiang. Variable Filter Radius Sensitivity Filtering Method Considering Density Compensation[J]. China Mechanical Engineering, 2017, 28(6): 669-675.
[12]WANG M Y, ZHOU S, DING H. Nonlinear Diffusions in Topology Optimization[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2004, 28(4): 262-276.
[13]WANG M Y, WANG S. Bilateral Filtering for Structural Topology Optimization[J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2005, 63(13): 1911-1938.

[1]	赵清海1,2;张洪信2;蒋荣超2;华青松1,2;袁林2. 考虑拓扑相关热载荷的散热结构多相材料拓扑优化设计[J]. 中国机械工程, 2020, 31(20): 2403-2411.
[2]	王冠1；张骞2；寇琳媛1；刘志文3；李世康3. 基于混合元胞自动机算法的连续体结构非线性拓扑优化[J]. 中国机械工程, 2020, 31(18): 2161-2173.
[3]	陈涛1;李宁宁1;李卓1;李奇奇1;陈少伟1;张茜2. 侧面柱碰撞条件下电动汽车电池系统结构优化[J]. 中国机械工程, 2020, 31(09): 1021-1030.
[4]	李宇鹏1,2；巴春来1；刘来超3. 采用结构仿生的重型机床立柱的综合优化[J]. 中国机械工程, 2019, 30(13): 1621-1625,1637.
[5]	邹坤;侯亮;卜祥建;方奕凯. 基于工况风险评估的叉车门架多工况拓扑优化[J]. 中国机械工程, 2019, 30(05): 568-577.
[6]	贺红林;夏自强;袁维东. 基于改进优化准则法的自由阻尼结构动力学拓扑优化[J]. 中国机械工程, 2018, 29(13): 1531-1539.
[7]	梁明轩1,2,3;李正刚2;唐任仲1;陈立2;黄川2. 基于柔性多体动力学的机械臂结构优化设计[J]. 中国机械工程, 2017, 28(21): 2562-2566.
[8]	房伟1;全书海1;谭保华2,3;冉斌4;王力1;焦亚田1. 汽车尾气热电转换装置电气拓扑结构优化[J]. 中国机械工程, 2017, 28(21): 2620-2626.
[9]	李昂;刘初升. 基于超单元技术的大型复杂结构的拓扑优化设计[J]. 中国机械工程, 2017, 28(20): 2467-2474.
[10]	杨江林1;张诗阳2. 基于非线性拓扑优化的汽车变厚度保险杠耐撞性设计[J]. 中国机械工程, 2017, 28(17): 2109-2114.
[11]	李昂;刘初升. 垃圾压缩站箱体结构的荷载分析及轻量化设计[J]. 中国机械工程, 2017, 28(17): 2124-2130.
[12]	宁晓斌1;刘亚冉1;李颉2;李光3;李佳林3. 基于拓扑优化方法的大型液压挖掘机斗杆新型结构[J]. 中国机械工程, 2017, 28(16): 1936-1942.
[13]	许小奎, 郭宝峰, 金淼. 基于密度体积插值方法的结构拓扑优化[J]. 中国机械工程, 2017, 28(11): 1269-1273.
[14]	邹中妃, 何林, 李家春, 陈跃威. 传热结构摄动敏度分析及动态拓扑优化[J]. 中国机械工程, 2017, 28(10): 1183-1190.
[15]	陈垂福, 杨晓翔. 一种考虑密度补偿的变过滤半径敏度过滤方法[J]. 中国机械工程, 2017, 28(06): 669-675.