行人与自动驾驶汽车的交互研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-132X.2023.05.002

中国机械工程 ›› 2023, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (05): 515-523.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-132X.2023.05.002

行人与自动驾驶汽车的交互研究

吕伟1;郭伏1;刘莉1;张泽宇1;王天博2

1.东北大学工商管理学院，沈阳，110169
2.沈阳航空航天大学经济与管理学院，沈阳，110136

出版日期:2023-03-10 发布日期:2023-03-27
通讯作者: 郭伏（通信作者），女，1964年生，教授、博士研究生导师。研究方向为人因工程、人机交互、用户体验。发表论文100余篇。E-mail:fguo@mail.neu.edu.cn。
作者简介:吕伟，男，1993年生，博士研究生。研究方向为人因工程、人机交互、自动驾驶。E-mail:lyuwei2020@gmail.com。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（71471033,71771045）

Research on Interaction between Pedestrian and Automated Vehicle

LYU Wei1;GUO Fu 1;LIU Li1;ZHANG Zeyu1;WANG Tianbo2

1.School of Business Administration,Northeastern University,Shenyang，110169
2.Economic and Management School,Shenyang Aerospace University,Shenyang,110136

Online:2023-03-10 Published:2023-03-27

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 从行人汽车环境系统视角出发，探索道路交通系统中行人安全设施、自动驾驶汽车让行行为、驶近方向以及外部人机界面（eHMI）等因素对行人与自动驾驶汽车交互过程的影响。基于洞穴式自动虚拟环境（CAVE）仿真平台，使用Unity 3D软件设计、开发了自动驾驶汽车的驾驶场景，招募38名志愿者参与行人与自动驾驶汽车交互实验，并记录交互过程中行人的决策时间、决策结果和交互体验等数据。利用生存分析对38名行人被试的实验数据进行了统计学分析，结果表明：在有自动驾驶汽车的交通环境中，行人安全设施、自动驾驶汽车的让行行为和eHMI能够显著缩短行人决策时间、提升交互体验、提高交通效率。但行人安全设施对行人决策与行为的影响主要体现在过街间隙出现的早期，汽车让行行为的影响相对滞后，同时光带式eHMI用于传达自动驾驶汽车让行意图的效力和清晰度有限。

关键词: 自动驾驶汽车, 行人, 人车交互, 外部人机界面（eHMI）, 生存分析

Abstract: From the perspective of the pedestrian-vehicle-environment system, the effects of pedestrian safety facility, AVs yielding behavior, approaching direction and eHMI on pedestrian-AV interaction were investigated. Based on a cave automatic virtual environment(CAVE) simulation platform, the Unity 3D software was utilized to design and develop the AVs driving scenario. Thirty-eight volunteers were recruited for the pedestrian-AV interaction experiments. During the experiments, the participants decision time, decision results and subjective experience were recorded and further statistically analyzed with survival analysis. The results indicate that with the presence of an AV in the traffic, pedestrian safety facility, AVs yielding behavior and eHMI may significantly shorten pedestrians decision time, enhance their interactive experience and improve traffic efficiency. However, the influences of pedestrian safety facility on pedestrians crossing decision and behavior exist from the earlier stage of the crossing gap, compared with AVs yielding behavior. Meanwhile, the efficacy and clarity of a light band-based eHMI are somewhat limited for conveying AVs yielding intention.

Key words: , automated vehicle(AV), pedestrian, human-vehicle interaction, external human-machine interface(eHMI), survival analysis

中图分类号:

U461

吕伟, 郭伏, 刘莉, 张泽宇, 王天博. 行人与自动驾驶汽车的交互研究[J]. 中国机械工程, 2023, 34(05): 515-523.

LYU Wei, GUO Fu , LIU Li, ZHANG Zeyu, WANG Tianbo. Research on Interaction between Pedestrian and Automated Vehicle[J]. China Mechanical Engineering, 2023, 34(05): 515-523.

参考文献

［1］WANG K, LI G, CHEN J, et al. The Adaptability and Challenges of Autonomous Vehicles to Pedestrians in Urban China［J］. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2020, 145:105692.
［2］FAGNANT D J, KOCKELMAN K. Preparing a Nation for Autonomous Vehicles:Opportunities, Barriers and Policy Recommendations［J］. Transportation Research Part A:Policy and Practice, 2015, 77:167-181.
［3］SAE International. Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to Driving Automation Systems for On-road Motor Vehicles:J3016［S］. Warrendale:SAE International, 2018:19.
［4］RASOULI A, TSOTSOS J K. Autonomous Vehicles That Interact with Pedestrians:a Survey of Theory and Practice［J］. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2020, 21(3):900-918.
［5］MARKKULA G, MADIGAN R, NATHANAEL D, et al. Defining Interactions:a Conceptual Framework for Understanding Interactive Behaviour in Human and Automated Road Traffic［J］. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 2020, 21(6):728-752.
［6］DEY D, MATVIIENKO A, BERGER M, et al. Communicating the Intention of an Automated Vehicle to Pedestrians:the Contributions of EHMI and Vehicle Behavior［J］. Information Technology, 2020, 63(2):123-141.
［7］DELUCIA P R. Critical Roles for Distance, Task and Motion in Space Perception:Initial Conceptual Framework and Practical Implications［J］. Human Factors, 2008, 50(5):811-820.
［8］DE CLERCQ K, DIETRICH A, NEZ VELASCO J P, et al. External Human-Machine Interfaces on Automated Vehicles:Effects on Pedestrian Crossing Decisions［J］. Human Factors, 2019, 61(8):1353-1370.
［9］DEY D, HABIBOVIC A, LCKEN A, et al. Taming the EHMI Jungle:a Classification Taxonomy to Guide, Compare, and Assess the Design Principles of Automated Vehicles External Human-Machine Interfaces［J］. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 2020, 7:100174-100198.
［10］CARMONA J, GUINDEL C, GARCIA F, et al. Ehmi:Review and Guidelines for Deployment on Autonomous Vehicles［J］. Sensors, 2021, 21(9):2912.
［11］FUEST T, MICHALOWSKI L, TRRIS L, et al. Using the Driving Behavior of an Automated Vehicle to Communicate Intentions：Wizard of Oz Study［C］∥21st IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, ITSC 2018. New York:IEEE, 2018:3596-3601.
［12］LEE Y M, MADIGAN R, UZONDU C, et al. Learning to Interpret Novel EHMI:the Effect of Vehicle Kinematics and EHMI Familiarity on Pedestrian Crossing Behavior［J］. Journal of Safety Research, 2022, 80:270-280.
［13］KALEEFATHULLAH A A, MERAT N, LEE Y M, et al. External Human-Machine Interfaces Can Be Misleading:an Examination of Trust Development and Misuse in a CAVE-based Pedestrian Simulation Environment［J］. Human Factors, 2020， 64(6):1-16.
［14］LEVULYTE· L, BARANYAI D, SOKOLOVSKIJ E, et al. Pedestrians Role in Road Accidents［J］. International Journal for Traffic and Transport Engineering, 2017, 7(3):328-341.
［15］ACKERMANS S, DEY D, RUIJTEN P, et al. The Effects of Explicit Intention Communication, Conspicuous Sensors, and Pedestrian Attitude in Interactions with Automated Vehicles［C］∥Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings. New York:Association for Computing Machinery, 2020:1-14.
［16］TIWARI G, BANGDIWALA S, SARASWAT A, et al. Survival Analysis:Pedestrian Risk Exposure at Signalized Intersections［J］. Transportation Research Part F:Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2007, 10(2):77-89.
［17］KALATIAN A, FAROOQ B. Decoding Pedestrian and Automated Vehicle Interactions Using Immersive Virtual Reality and Interpretable Deep Learning［J］. Transportation Research Part C:Emerging Technologies, 2021, 124:1-25.
［18］KALATIAN A, SOBHANI A, FAROOQ B. Analysis of Distracted Pedestrians Waiting Time:Head-mounted Immersive Virtual Reality Application［J］. Collective Dynamics, 2020, 5(118):1-7.
［19］RAZMI RAD S, HOMEM de ALMEIDA CORREIA G, HAGENZIEKER M. Pedestrians Road Crossing Behaviour in Front of Automated Vehicles:Results from a Pedestrian Simulation Experiment Using Agent-based Modelling［J］. Transportation Research Part F:Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2020, 69:101-119.
［20］CLAMANN M. Evaluation of Vehicle-to-pedestrian Communication Displays for Autonomous Vehicles［J］. Human Factors:the Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2017, 57(3):407-434.
［21］DYLAN M, CURRANO R, ELLA S, et al. The Case for Implicit External Human-Machine Interfaces for Autonomous Vehicles［C］∥AutomotiveUI 19:Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications. New York:Association for Computing Machinery, 2019:295-307.
［22］HABIBOVIC A, LUNDGREN V M, ANDERSSON J, et al. Communicating Intent of Automated Vehicles to Pedestrians［J］. Frontiers in Psychology, 2018, 9:1-18.
［23］EISMA Y B, VAN BERGEN S, TER BRAKE S M, et al. External Human-Machine Interfaces:the Effect of Display Location on Crossing Intentions and Eye Movements［J］. Information(Switzerland), 2020, 11(13):1-18.
［24］GUO F, LYU W, REN Z, et al. A Video-based, Eye-tracking Study to Investigate the Effect of EHMI Modalities and Locations on Pedestrian-automated Vehicle Interaction［J］. Sustainability(Switzerland), 2022, 14(9):5633-5654.
［25］HOCHMAN M, PARMET Y, ORON-GILAD T. Pedestrians Understanding of a Fully Autonomous Vehicles Intent to Stop:a Learning Effect Over Time［J］. Frontiers in Psychology, 2020, 11:3407-3418.
［26］LEE Y M, MADIGAN R, UZONDU C, et al. Learning to Interpret Novel EHMI:the Effect of Vehicle Kinematics and EHMI Familiarity on Pedestrians Crossing Behaviour［J］. Journal of Safety Research, 2022, 80:270-280.
［27］LI B. A Model of Pedestrians Intended Waiting Times for Street Crossings at Signalized Intersections［J］. Transportation Research Part B:Methodological, 2013, 51:17-28.

[1]	杨志光, 张永林, 谢经明, 陈幼平. 基于双目视觉和约束条件的行人目标定位[J]. 中国机械工程, 2016, 27(23): 3171-3175.
[2]	钱立军, 宋佳, 谷先广. 基于行人小腿保护的保险杠结构稳健性优化设计[J]. 中国机械工程, 2015, 26(7): 982-987.
[3]	曹立波, 龙腾蛟, 张冠军, 刘适. 基于行人保护的轿车前部造型特征研究[J]. 中国机械工程, 2013, 24(16): 2266-2271.

行人与自动驾驶汽车的交互研究

Research on Interaction between Pedestrian and Automated Vehicle

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 3

编辑推荐

Metrics