考虑路面附着和自适应时间系数影响的车道保持控制

中国机械工程

考虑路面附着和自适应时间系数影响的车道保持控制

凤鹏飞1，2;金会庆1，2;王慧然3;刘法勇4

1.安徽三联学院交通工程学院，合肥，230601
2.国家车辆驾驶安全工程技术研究中心，合肥，230601
3.合肥工业大学汽车与交通工程学院, 合肥，230009
4.江淮汽车集团股份有限公司, 合肥，230601

出版日期:2019-04-10 发布日期:2019-04-04
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(51675151)；
安徽省高校自然科学研究重点资助项目（KJ2016A890）

Lane Keeping Control by Considering Influences of Road Adhesion and Adaptive Time Coefficients

FENG Pengfei1，2;JIN Huiqing1，2; WANG Huiran3;LIU Fayong4

1.School of Traffic Engineering,Anhui Sanlian University,Hefei,230601
2.National Center of Engineering and Technology for Vehicle Driving Safety，Hefei，230601
3.School of Automobile and Traffic Engineering,Hefei University of Technology,Hefei,230009
4.Jianghuai Automobile Group Co.,Ltd.,Hefei,230601

Online:2019-04-10 Published:2019-04-04

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 分析了路面附着系数对车辆控制的影响，根据车辆线性二自由度模型与一定的预瞄信息获得车辆-道路动力学模型，并给出了基于Brush轮胎模型的路面附着系数估计算法。针对车道保持转向过程中的车身横摆角速度与转向角的时间延迟现象，提出与路面附着系数有关的自适应时间系数，并加入到车辆-道路动力学模型中。在此基础上，基于滑模控制理论设计横摆角速度滑模控制器来跟踪期望车辆状态，获得理想的转向角。最后，进行了基于CarSim/Simulink的仿真计算和硬件在环台架试验，研究结果表明，在不同路面附着系数下考虑自适应时间系数可改善车道保持控制效果。

关键词: 路面附着系数, 自适应时间系数, 滑模控制, 硬件在环试验

Abstract: The influences of road adhesion coefficients on vehicle control were analyzed. The vehicle-road dynamics model was obtained according to the vehicle linear two degrees of freedom models and certain preview informations. An estimation algorithm of road adhesion coefficients was presented based on Brush tire model，in view of the time delay between yaw speed and steering angle, an adaptive time coefficient related to the road adhesion coefficients was put forward and added to the vehicle-road dynamics model. Based on the sliding mode control theory, the yaw rate sliding mode controllers were designed to track the desired vehicle state and obtain an ideal steer angle. Finally, based on CarSim/Simulink simulation and HIL tests, the effectiveness of lane keeping control considering the adaptive time coefficient under different road adhesion coefficients are improved.

Key words: road adhesion coefficient, adaptive time coefficient, sliding mode control, hardware-in-loop(HIL) test

中图分类号:

U471.15

凤鹏飞1，2;金会庆1，2;王慧然3;刘法勇4. 考虑路面附着和自适应时间系数影响的车道保持控制[J]. 中国机械工程.

FENG Pengfei1，2;JIN Huiqing1，2; WANG Huiran3;LIU Fayong4. Lane Keeping Control by Considering Influences of Road Adhesion and Adaptive Time Coefficients[J]. China Mechanical Engineering.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.cmemo.org.cn/CN/

https://www.cmemo.org.cn/CN/Y2019/V30/I07/804

参考文献

[1]王家恩. 基于视觉的驾驶员横向辅助系统关键技术研究[D]. 合肥：合肥工业大学，2013.
WANG Jiaen. Key Technology Research of Driver Lateral Assistance System Based on Vision[D]. Hefei: Hefei University of Technology, 2013.
[2]MERAH A, HARTANI K, DRAOU A. A New Shared Control for Lane Keeping and Road Departure Prevention[J].Vehicle System Dynamics, 2015, 54(1):1-16.
[3]柳长春, 都东, 潘际銮. 基于小偏差模型预测的车道保持辅助控制[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2015， 55(10):1087-1092.
LIU Changchun, DU Dong, Pan Jiluan. Auxiliary Control of Lane Keeping Based on Small Deviation Model [J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Natural Science Edition), 2015， 55(10): 1087-1092.
[4]裴延亮. 面向电动汽车主动安全系统的路面附着系数估算[D]. 沈阳：沈阳工业大学，2013.
PEI Yanliang. Estimation of Road Adhesion Coefficient for Electric Vehicle Active Safety System [D]. Shenyang: Shenyang University of Technology, 2013.
[5]RAJAMANI R. Vehicle Dynamics and Control[M]. New York: Spriger-Verlag, 2011.
[6]KANG C M, LEE S H, CHUNG C C. Lane Keeping System Based on Kinematic Model with Road Friction Coefficient Adaptation [J]. IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, 2016, 4:552-557.
[7]KANG C M, LEE S H, CHUNG C C. A Comparative Study of Lane Keeping System: Dynamic and Kinematic Models with Look-ahead Distance [J]. IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, 2015, 4:1038-1043.
[8]陈海军.4WS汽车虚拟模型建模与操纵稳定性仿真[D].南京:南京林业大学,2007.
CHEN Haijun.4WS Vehicle Virtual Model Modeling and Handling Stability Simulation [D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Forestry University, 2007.
[9]ZHAO J, ZHANG J, ZHU B. Development and Verification of the Tire/Road Friction Estimation Algorithm for Antilock Braking System[J]. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2014（7）： 786492.
[10]CHOI M, OH J J, CHOI S B. Linearized Recursive Least Squares Methods for Real-time Identification of Tire-road Friction Coefficient [J]. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2013, 62(7):2906-2918.
[11]刘伟. 汽车ESP系统控制策略研究及硬件在环验证[D]. 合肥:合肥工业大学, 2017.
LIU Wei. Research on Control Strategy of Automotive ESP System and Hardware in Loop Verification [D]. Hefei: Hefei University of Technology, 2017.
[12]KANG C M, LEE S H, CHUNG C C. Adaptive Side Slip Angle Observer Using Simple Combined Vehicle Dynamics [J]. IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, 2013, 10:85-90.
[13]李玮，王晶，段建明. 车道线保持自校正滑模控制[J].公路交通科技，2011，28（6）136-140.
LI Wei, WANG Jing, DUAN Jianming. Lane Keeping Self-tuning Sliding Mode Control [J]. Road Traffic Science and Technology, 2011, 28(6): 136-140.

[1]	张文华1, 尹文良1, 张祯滨2, 刘琳3, 彭克1. 计及叶轮不平衡的差动调速风电机组变桨距控制[J]. 中国机械工程, 2024, 35(10): 1890-1899.
[2]	吕播阳1, 2, 3, 孟庆鑫1, 2, 3, 肖怀1, 2, 3, 赖旭芝1, 2, 3, 王亚午1, 2, 3, 吴敏1, 2, 3. 基于改进三元模型的波纹管型气动软体驱动器神经网络滑模控制[J]. 中国机械工程, 2024, 35(08): 1414-1425.
[3]	吴迎年, 张晶, 李庆奎, 焦帅, . 需求扰动作用下的供应链库存系统优化模型[J]. 中国机械工程, 2023, 34(14): 1672-1682，1700.
[4]	赵希梅, 王超, 金鸿雁. 基于NDO的永磁同步电动机自适应分数阶滑模控制[J]. 中国机械工程, 2023, 34(09): 1093-1099,1119.
[5]	刘俊, 石朝欢, 林贝清, 黄鹤. 多轴车辆线控液压转向系统设计及转角控制[J]. 中国机械工程, 2022, 33(14): 1741-1750.
[6]	刘艳雄, , 王根聚, 华林, 赵新浩, . 采用自适应滑模变结构控制的精冲机双驱动协调控制系统[J]. 中国机械工程, 2021, 32(18): 2189-2196.
[7]	范爱民;常思勤;陈慧涛. 电磁驱动配气机构的反演滑模控制[J]. 中国机械工程, 2020, 31(03): 274-280,288.
[8]	黄道敏1,2；韩丽君1；唐国元1；周曾成1；徐国华1. 水下机械手分数阶积分滑模轨迹跟踪控制方法研究[J]. 中国机械工程, 2019, 30(13): 1513-1518.
[9]	寇发荣1;许家楠1;刘大鹏2;张凯1;孙凯1 . 电动静液压主动悬架双滑模控制研究[J]. 中国机械工程, 2019, 30(05): 542-548,553.
[10]	李逃昌. 农业轮式移动机器人自适应滑模路径跟踪控制[J]. 中国机械工程, 2018, 29(05): 579-584,590.
[11]	陈松, 夏长高, 孙旭. 基于滑模变结构理论的车辆主动横向稳定杆控制[J]. 中国机械工程, 2016, 27(23): 3259-3265.
[12]	洪昭斌, 陈力, 李文望. 柔性臂杆、柔性关节空间机械臂TS模糊轨迹跟踪及双柔振动并行综合控制[J]. 中国机械工程, 2016, 27(15): 2020-2026.
[13]	赵韩, 赵福民, 黄康, 邵可, 孙浩. 液压马达式汽车主动稳定杆系统建模与控制[J]. 中国机械工程, 2016, 27(14): 1976-1981.
[14]	何雄, 张农, 孔国玲. 基于动态滑模算法的AMT选换挡电机控制[J]. 中国机械工程, 2016, 27(10): 1414-1419.
[15]	高国琴, 范杜娟, 方志明. 汽车电泳涂装输送用新型混联机构的动力学控制[J]. 中国机械工程, 2016, 27(08): 1012-1018.