球形件反复拉深成形工艺有限元模拟及试验

中国机械工程 ›› 2015, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (11): 1538-1541,1549.

球形件反复拉深成形工艺有限元模拟及试验

骆俊廷1,2;田保瑞1;陈艺敏1;张春祥1

1.燕山大学先进锻压成形技术与科学教育部重点实验室，秦皇岛，066004
2.燕山大学亚稳材料制备技术与科学国家重点实验室，秦皇岛，066004

出版日期:2015-06-10 发布日期:2015-06-05
基金资助:
河北省自然科学基金资助项目

Finite Element Simulation and Experiments for Repetitive Deep Drawing of Spherical Parts

Luo Junting1,2;Tian Baorui1;Chen Yimin1;Zhang Chunxiang1

1.Education Ministry Key Laboratory of Advanced Forging and Stamping Science and Technology, Yanshan University，Qinhuangdao，Hebei，066004
2.State Key Laboratory of Metastable Materials Science and Technology，Yanshan University，Qinhuangdao，Hebei，066004

Online:2015-06-10 Published:2015-06-05
Supported by:
Hebei Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

提出了球形件反复拉深成形工艺，对该工艺进行了有限元模拟与试验验证。与一次拉深成形工艺进行了对比分析，结果表明：凹模圆角区与法兰区应力状态及大小基本相同，但在球底区，反复拉深时径向应力和周向应力都远小于一次拉深的应力，球底区径向应力和周向应力基本为压应力或很小的拉应力；反复拉深时球底区厚度方向应变明显减小，一次拉深、二次反复拉深、三次反复拉深成形的制品最薄点减薄率分别为0.189、0.122、0.049，三次反复拉深可实现近等壁厚制品的拉深成形。该工艺与筒底冷校形工艺相结合，可实现近等壁厚深筒形零件的拉深成形。

关键词: 球形件, 反复拉深, 有限元模拟, 近等壁厚成形

Abstract:

A new repetitive deep drawing forming of spherical parts was presented and finite element simulation and experiments were carried out. The stress state and values were almost equal in the flange area and in the circle-corners compared with once deep drawing forming, but in the ball bottom area the radial stresses and circumferential stresses were pressure stresses or small tensile stresses, which were much less than that in once deep drawing. The thinning strain of parts is reduced evidently in the ball bottom area for repetitive deep drawing. The thinning rate of forming parts in thinnest point for once deep drawing, 2-time deep drawing and 3-time deep drawing are as 0.189, 0.122, 0.049 respectively.The thinning strain is very small in the 3-time repetitive deep drawing, which realizes near equal-thickness wall forming. Combined with the bottom cold sizing technology, the technology can realize the forming of deep cup with uniform thickness.

Key words: spherical part, repetitive deep drawing, finite element simulation, near equal-thickness wall forming

中图分类号:

TG386

骆俊廷, 田保瑞, 陈艺敏, 张春祥. 球形件反复拉深成形工艺有限元模拟及试验[J]. 中国机械工程, 2015, 26(11): 1538-1541,1549.

Luo Junting, Tian Baorui, Chen Yimin, Zhang Chunxiang. Finite Element Simulation and Experiments for Repetitive Deep Drawing of Spherical Parts[J]. China Mechanical Engineering, 2015, 26(11): 1538-1541,1549.

[1]	董国疆, 赵长财, 曹秒艳, 郝海滨, 杨东峰. 圆筒件固体颗粒介质成形壁厚及变形规律研究 [J]. J4, 201016, 21(16): 1992-1998.
[2]	刘萌, 单忠德, 李新亚, 臧勇, 黄江华. [材料成形中的数字化与智能化产品设计]6016铝合金汽车典型结构件固溶成形工艺研究[J]. 中国机械工程, 2020, 31(22): 2648-2654.
[3]	徐勇, 李明, 夏亮亮, 张士宏, . [材料绿色成形技术]异形排气管多向局部加载液力成形工艺[J]. 中国机械工程, 2020, 31(22): 2763-2771.
[4]	彭锐涛1;李仲平1;黄晓芳1;唐新姿1;胡云波2. 加压内冷却方法在高温合金磨削中的应用[J]. 中国机械工程, 2017, 28(16): 2008-2015.
[5]	吴娜, 王连东, 沈亚坤, 张蒙. 充液压制成形汽车桥壳后盖区开裂分析及预成形管坯形状优化设计[J]. 中国机械工程, 2016, 27(23): 3246-3251.
[6]	周宏明, 张衡, 张祥雷, 彭姣娇, 张翔翔. 钻头冷镦参数建模及成形工艺优化[J]. 中国机械工程, 2016, 27(21): 2962-2966.
[7]	周梦成, 冯飞, 胡建华, 雷雨, 何鹏, 黄尚宇, 邹方利. AZ31B镁合金断裂应变与应力三轴度的关系研究[J]. 中国机械工程, 2015, 26(5): 694-698.
[8]	张伯奇, 蔡志鹏, 李克俭, 李轶非, 潘际銮. 异种钢焊接接头蠕变过程的有限元模拟[J]. 中国机械工程, 2015, 26(2): 266-271.
[9]	黄俊, 薛鹏举, 魏青松, 史玉升. Ti6Al4V合金整体零件的两步热等静压近净成形工艺探究[J]. 中国机械工程, 2015, 26(18): 2539-2544.
[10]	杨庆华, 洪潇潇, 王志恒, 鲍官军, 胡新华, 薛军义. 电液颤振对冷挤压塑性成形件金属流线及晶粒组织的影响[J]. 中国机械工程, 2015, 26(16): 2226-2232.
[11]	王连东;庞蒙;周立凤;崔亚平. 中型卡车胀压成形桥壳预成形管坯的设计及成形分析[J]. 中国机械工程, 2015, 26(12): 1684-1689.
[12]	袁启龙;李言;杨明顺;李玉玺. 块体材料冷滚打成形变形力研究[J]. 中国机械工程, 2014, 25(2): 251-256.
[13]	顾勇飞1, 骆俊廷1, 温雅丽2, 徐艳霞1, 李洪波1. 纳米Si2N2O-Sialon陶瓷齿轮超塑性锻造研究[J]. 中国机械工程, 2012, 23(13): 1620-1622,1628.
[14]	黄倩影, 骆俊廷, 范存杰, 张春祥. 板料颗粒介质软凹模成形颗粒运动规律研究 [J]. 中国机械工程, 2012, 23(1): 113-116,125.
[15]	孙前江, 王高潮, 黄映霞. 大型座舱骨架整体成形有限元模拟及实验研究 [J]. 中国机械工程, 2011, 22(20): 2503-2506.