单平台下参数化产品族设计的两阶段智能优化算法

中国机械工程 ›› 2011, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (17): 2097-2103.

单平台下参数化产品族设计的两阶段智能优化算法

王克喜1;袁际军2;陈为民1;全春光1

1.湖南科技大学，湘潭，411201

2.广东商学院，广州，510320

出版日期:2011-09-10 发布日期:2011-09-14
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(70971036，70671037)；湖南省哲学社会科学规划项目(08YBB282)
National Natural Science Foundation of China（No. 70971036，70671037）

A Two-stage Multi-objective Intelligent Optimization Algorithm for Single Platform Based Product Family Design

Wang Kexi1;Yuan Jijun2;Chen Weimin1;Quan Chunguang1

1.Hunan University of Science and Technology,Xiangtan,Hunan,411201

2.Guangdong University of Business Studies,Guangzhou,510320

Online:2011-09-10 Published:2011-09-14
Supported by:

National Natural Science Foundation of China（No. 70971036，70671037）

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

基于对参数化产品族优化设计问题特性的分析，提出了单平台下参数化产品族的两阶段优化设计方法。针对单平台产品族优化设计的特征，给出了单平台下参数化产品族优化设计的一般数学模型，在此基础上提出了平台变量值预先设定时的产品族优化模型，给出了采用拥挤距离排序的多目标约束遗传算法(CDSMOGA)对该模型进行优化求解的过程。对单平台下平台变量值已知时的通用电动机产品族优化数学模型进行了仿真运算。对比仿真结果与国内外文献中的相关结果发现，所提出的方法能够显著改善产品族的整体性能，在参数化产品族的优化设计上是有效的。

关键词:

参数化产品族, 多目标优化, 遗传算法, 拥挤距离排序

Abstract:

According to analyses of multi-objective optimization problem for single platform based product family，a two-stage method for the optimization problem of product family was proposed. Based on the model of the optimization problem of single platform product family, an optimization model and the procedure to solve this model, CDSMOGA(crowding distance sorting multi-objective genetic algorithm) was given. The simulation experiments also show that the results obtained from platform variables values without setting in advance during the process of corresponding algorithm running are better than that of platform variables values setting in advance. However, the former has a higher computational complexity.

Key words: scale-based product family, multi-objective optimization, genetic algorithm, crowding distance sorting

中图分类号:

TH122

王克喜1, 袁际军2, 陈为民1, 全春光1.

单平台下参数化产品族设计的两阶段智能优化算法

[J]. 中国机械工程, 2011, 22(17): 2097-2103.

WANG Ke-Chi-1, YUAN Ji-Jun-2, CHEN Wei-Min-1, QUAN Chun-Guang-1.

A Two-stage Multi-objective Intelligent Optimization Algorithm for Single Platform Based Product Family Design

[J]. China Mechanical Engineering, 2011, 22(17): 2097-2103.

参考文献

[1]Rothwell R, Gardiner P. Robustness and Product Design Families[M]. Oakley M, ed. Design Man- agement:a Handbook of Issues and Methods. Cam- bridge, MA: Basil Blaekwell, 1990:279-292.
[2]Simpson T W, Maier J R A, Mistree F. Product Platform Design.. Method and Application[J]. Re- search in Engineering Design, 2001, 13 ( 1 ) : 371 - 386.
[3]Simpson T W. Product Platform Design and Opti mization: Status and Promise[J]. Artificial Intelli gence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manu facturing, 2004, 18(1): 3-20.
[4]Simpson T W,D'Souza B. Assessing Variable Lev- els of Platform Commonality within a Product Family Using a Multi--objective Genetic Algo- rithm[J]. Current Engineering, 2004, 12(2) : 119- 129.
[5]Nelson S A, Parkinson M B, Papalambros P Y. Multicriteria Optimization in Product Platform De- sign[J]. Journal of Mechanical Design, 2001, 123 (6):199-204.
[6]Dai Z, Scott M. Effective Product Family Design Using Preference Aggregation[J]. Journal of Me- chanical Design, 2006, 128(4) :659-668.
[7]Thevenot H, Nanda J,Simpson T. A Methodology to Support Product Family Redesign Using a Ge- netic Algorithm and Commonality Indices [C]// Proceedings of ASME International Design Engi- neering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. Long Beach, 2005 : 1009-1018.
[8]Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S. A Fast and Elitist Multi--objective Genetic Algorithm: NSGA-- Ⅱ [J]. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computa- tion, 2002, 6(2): 82-197.
[9]Srinivas N, Deb K. Multi--objective Function Op- timization Using Nondominated Sorting Genetic Algorithms[J]. Evolutionary Computations, 1995, 2(3): 221-248.
[10]Mitra K, Gopinath R. Multi--objective Optimiza- tion of an Industrial Grinding Operation Using Elitist Nondominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm [J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2004, 59(2): 385-396.
[11]Milosevic B. Nondominated Sorting Genetic Algo- rithm for Optimal Phasor Measurement Placement [J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2003, 18(1) : 69-75.
[12]Abido M A. Multi--objective Evolutionary Algo- rithms for Electric Power Dispatch Problem[J]. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2006, 10(3): 315-329.
[13]Simpson T W. A Concept Exploration Method for Product Family Design[D]. Allanta.-Georgia Insti- tute of Technology, 1998.
[14]王克喜.大规模定制下参数化产品族多目标智能优化方法与应用[D].长沙:湖南大学,2011.

[1]	王国彪, 赖一楠, 范大鹏, 杨华勇, 王时龙. 新型精密传动机构设计与制造综述 [J]. J4, 201016, 21(16): 1891-1897.
[2]	王立存, 陈进, 张贤明, 陈国强. 基于泛函的制冷涡旋压缩机变壁厚涡旋型线理论及形状优化 [J]. J4, 201016, 21(16): 1898-1901.
[3]	李小力, 陈威, 闫蓉. 基于BP神经网络的空间轮廓误差自适应补偿 [J]. J4, 201016, 21(16): 1902-1906.
[4]	夏瑞雪, 卢荣胜, 刘宁, 董敬涛. 基于圆点阵列靶标的特征点坐标自动提取方法 [J]. J4, 201016, 21(16): 1906-1910.
[5]	陈立锋, 吴晓铃, 秦大同, 肖正明. 齿轮啮合过程摩擦功耗研究 [J]. J4, 201016, 21(16): 1911-1915.
[6]	李明磊, 贾育秦, 张学良, 刘丽琴, 杜娟, 温淑花, 兰国生. 基于多目标差异演化算法的并联机构结构优化 [J]. J4, 201016, 21(16): 1915-1920.
[7]	吴怀超, 吴白羽, 张秀华. 石蜡感温阀传热性能的数字仿真研究 [J]. J4, 201016, 21(16): 1921-1926.
[8]	鲁开讲, 师俊平, 张锋涛. 平面三自由度并联机构动力学优化设计 [J]. J4, 201016, 21(16): 1926-1931.
[9]	张敏杰, 王庆九, 管成. 并联式油液混合动力挖掘机动力系统仿真研究 [J]. J4, 201016, 21(16): 1932-1936.
[10]	刘安平, 刘济春. IPC-208B型原子力显微镜大范围扫描三维驱动系统研究 [J]. J4, 201016, 21(16): 1936-1940.
[11]	姚运萍, 王智渊. 螺栓连接受载能量损失与结合面参数识别 [J]. J4, 201016, 21(16): 1941-1943,1951.
[12]	陈建, 邓利娟. 恒力弹性机构的设计 [J]. J4, 201016, 21(16): 1944-1946.
[13]	罗洁思, 于德介, 史美丽. 基于SVD和线调频小波路径追踪的转速波动齿轮箱故障诊断 [J]. J4, 201016, 21(16): 1947-1951.
[14]	战晓磊, 辛洪兵, 汉斯·彼德　兰特斯. 基于虚拟现实的MOTOMAN-HP3型机器人运动学仿真 [J]. J4, 201016, 21(16): 1952-1954,1998.
[15]	苏厚军, 史铁林, 陈非. 高炉煤气透平机状态检修的设计与实施 [J]. J4, 201016, 21(16): 1955-1958.