军用工程机械测试性动态评价方法

中国机械工程 ›› 2015, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (14): 1882-1887.

军用工程机械测试性动态评价方法

王海涛1;张琦1;朱春生1,2;赵鸿飞1,3;李焕良1

1.解放军理工大学,南京,210007
2.中国人民解放军94686部队,上海,202100
3.中国人民解放军73016部队,镇江,212416

出版日期:2015-07-25 发布日期:2015-08-05
基金资助:
江苏省自然科学基金(青年基金)资助项目（BK2012061）;总装备部预研基金资助项目

Method of Testability Dynamic Evaluation for Military Engineering Machinery

Wang Haitao1;Zhang Qi1;Zhu Chunsheng1,2;Zhao Hongfei1,3;Li Huanliang1

1.PLA University of Science and Technology,Nanjing,210007
2.94636Troops of PLA,Shanghai,202100
3.73016 Troops of PLA,Zhenjiang,Jiangsu,212416

Online:2015-07-25 Published:2015-08-05
Supported by:
Jiangsu Provincial Youth Natural Science Foundation of China（No. BK2012061）;National Defense Pre-research Foundation of General Armament Department

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为了实现对测试性设计过程中测试性指标要求的精确、科学的评价，针对测试性评价指标的动态特性，引入了时间序列参数，构建了由评价对象、评价指标和评价时间构成的三维动态评价模型，将主观权重关系和客观权重函数确定方法相结合，提出了一种测试性动态评价三维排序矩阵的降维求解方法，实现了对军用工程机械测试性设计过程的动态评价。实例验证结果表明，该测试性动态评价方法所得测试性水平的变化与实际测试性设计过程中测试性水平的变化基本吻合，能够对军用工程机械测试性设计过程进行有效的测试性动态评价。

关键词: 军用工程机械, 测试性, 动态评价, 评价模型

Abstract:

In order to achieve the accurate and scientific evaluation of the testability index requirements, based on the dynamic characteristics of the testability evaluation indexes, the time series were introduced to build three-dimensional evaluation model which consisted of evaluation object, evaluation index, and evaluation time. The dimension reduction algorithm which combined the subjective weight determination method and the objective weight function was used to solve the dynamic three-dimensional appraisal matrix. And the dynamic evaluation of testability design process for military engineering machinery was realized. The application instance shows that the dynamic evaluation method can provide effective evaluation for testability design process of military engineering machinery.

Key words: military engineering , machinery;testability;dynamic evaluation;evaluation model

中图分类号:

TP206

王海涛, 张琦, 朱春生, 赵鸿飞, 李焕良. 军用工程机械测试性动态评价方法[J]. 中国机械工程, 2015, 26(14): 1882-1887.

Wang Haitao, Zhang Qi, Zhu Chunsheng, Zhao Hongfei, Li Huanliang. Method of Testability Dynamic Evaluation for Military Engineering Machinery[J]. China Mechanical Engineering, 2015, 26(14): 1882-1887.

参考文献

[1]朱春生,张琦,冉红亮,等.工程装备测试性综合评价方法研究[J].中国机械工程,2011,22(9):1044-1048.
Zhu Chunsheng,Zhang Qi,Ran Hongliang,et al.Research on Testability Comprehensive Evaluation Method for Engineering Equipment[J]. China Mechanical Engineering,2011,22(9):1044-1048.
[2]田仲,石君友.系统测试性设计分析与验证[M].北京:北京航空航天大学出版社,2003.
[3]陈晓梅.一种简化的模拟电路测试性评价方法[J].电子产品可靠性与环境试验,2007,25(5):25-29.
Chen Xiaomei.A Simplified Inherited Testability Evaluation Method for Analog Circuit[J].Electronic Product Reliability and Environmental Testing,2007,25(5):25-29.
[4]李天梅.装备测试性验证试验优化设计与综合评估方法研究[D].长沙:国防科学技术大学,2010.
[5]常春贺,杨江平,王荣,等.基于物元可拓法的雷达装备测试性评价[J].雷达科学与技术,2012,10（1）:22-26.
Chang Chunhe,Yang Jiangping,Wang Rong,et al.Research on a Testability Evaluation Method of Radar Equipment Based on Matter-Element Analysis[J].Radar Science and Technology,2012,10(1):22-26.
[6]Zhang Xiaoni,Li Xianmin.Experimental Research on Dynamic Evaluation Method for Scale Inhibitors of Reverse Osmosis[J]. Applied Mechanics and Materials,2012,178/181:479-484.
[7]Pierce T,Hogrefe C,Rao S T,et al.Dynamic Evaluation of a Regional Air Quality Model:Assessing the Emissions-induced Weekly Ozone Cycle[J].Atmospheric Environment,2010,44(29):3583-3596.
[8]Liang P,Tripp O,Naik M,et al.A Dynamic Evaluation of the Precision of Static Heap Abstractions[J].ACM Sigplan Notices. ACM, 2010,45(10):411-427.
[9]柏磊，朱翔，朱晓华.基于动态评价方法的多态电路进化设计[J].南京航空航天大学学报,2012，44（3）：354-359.
Bai Lei,Zhu Xiang,Zhu Xiaohua.Evolutionary Design of Polymorphic Circuits Based on Dynamic Evaluation Method[J].Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics&Astronautics,2012,44(3):354-359.
[10]郭亚军,姚远,易平涛.一种动态综合评价方法及应用[J].系统工程理论与实践,2007(10):154-158.
Guo Yajun,Yao Yuan,Yi Pingtao.A Method and Application of Dynamic Comprehensive Evaluation[J].Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice,2007(10):154-158.
[11]Yager R R.On Ordered Weight Averaging Aggregation Operators in Multicriteria Decision Making[J]. IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man and Cybernetics,1988,18(1):183-190.

[1]	韩晓芹1,2;宋永锋1;刘雨1;李雄兵1. 基于超声无损评价的表面粗糙度测量方法[J]. 中国机械工程, 2019, 30(08): 883-889.
[2]	张雷;梁德潜;查晨东. 基于多源信息的复杂装备测试性评估[J]. 中国机械工程, 2017, 28(23): 2875-2879.
[3]	尤飞1;胡庆夕2;朱晓锦2. 再生骨支架内部结构性能的综合评价[J]. 中国机械工程, 2013, 24(20): 2768-2774.
[4]	杨钟亮, 孙守迁, 陈育苗. 基于sEMG的按摩椅绩效人机评价模型实验研究 [J]. 中国机械工程, 2012, 23(2): 220-224.
[5]	常春贺1, 曹鹏举1, 杨江平1, 胡亮2. 基于研制阶段试验数据的复杂装备测试性评估[J]. 中国机械工程, 2012, 23(13): 1577-1581.
[6]	朱春生, 张琦, 冉红亮, 焦玉民. 工程装备测试性综合评价方法研究 [J]. 中国机械工程, 2011, 22(9): 1044-1048.
[7]	陈希祥, 邱静, 刘冠军. 测试不确定条件下基于贝叶斯网络的装备测试优化选择技术 [J]. 中国机械工程, 2011, 22(4): 379-384.
[8]	刘明周, 龚任波, 扈静, 葛茂根. 基于灰色关联分析的操纵装置操纵舒适性评价 [J]. 中国机械工程, 2011, 22(21): 2642-2645.
[9]	扈静, 刘明周, 龚任波, 蒋增强, 葛茂根. 基于主成分分析的汽车操纵力舒适性分析与评价 [J]. 中国机械工程, 2011, 22(20): 2456-2459.
[10]	冉红亮, 张琦, 朱春生, 王菲. 一种基于多目标优化的测试性分配方法 [J]. 中国机械工程, 2011, 22(15): 1775-1778.
[11]	陈希祥, 邱静, 刘冠军. 装备系统测试性方案优化设计技术研究 [J]. 中国机械工程, 2010, 21(02): 141-145.
[12]	苏永定;刘冠军;邱静;徐玉国;. 不完备检测条件下的系统测试建模与分析[J]. J4, 2009, 20(18): 0-2267.
[13]	李天梅;邱静;刘冠军;. 测试性模拟故障注入试验中的故障模型研究[J]. J4, 2009, 20(16): 0-1895.
[14]	李峰平;周余庆;付培红;薛伟;. 基于灰关联分析的产品满意度三维层次评价模型[J]. J4, 2009, 20(12): 0-1511.