中国机械工程 ›› 2022, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (08): 908-914.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-132X.2022.08.004

• 机械基础工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

线性压缩机盘簧及组件性能分析

陈洪月1,2,3;张站立1;刘先阳1;陈洪岩1;黄鑫宇1;魏雅静4   

  1. 1.辽宁工程技术大学机械工程学院,阜新,123000
    2.中国煤炭工业协会高端综采成套装备动力学测试与大数据分析中心,阜新,123000
    3.矿山液压技术与装备国家工程研究中心,阜新,123000
    4.阜新市产业技术研究院,阜新,123000
  • 出版日期:2022-04-25 发布日期:2022-05-19
  • 通讯作者: 张站立(通信作者),男,1994年生,硕士研究生。研究方向为机械设计及理论。E-mail:zhanlistudy@126.com。
  • 作者简介:陈洪月,男,1982年生,教授、博士研究生导师。研究方向为机械系统结构优化设计。发表论文53篇。E-mail:chyxiaobao@126.com。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(51874157);
    辽宁省教育厅基础研究项目(LJ2020JCL026);
    辽宁省自然科学基金(2019-MS-161);
    2019年度辽宁省高等学校创新人才(理)项目(LR2019030)

Performance Analysis for Discoid Springs and Components of Linear Compressors

CHEN Hongyue1,2,3;ZHANG Zhanli1;LIU Xianyang1;CHEN Hongyan1;HUANG Xinyu1;WEI Yajing4   

  1. 1.College of Mechanical Engineering,Liaoning Technical University,Fuxin,Liaoning,123000
    2.Dynamic Research for High-end Complete Integrated Coal Mining Equipment and Big Data Analysis Center,China National Coal Association,Fuxin,Liaoning,123000
    3.Combined Mining Technology and Equipment Engineering National Research Center,Fuxin,Liaoning,123000
    4.Fuxin City Industrial Technology Research Institute,Fuxin,Liaoning,123000
  • Online:2022-04-25 Published:2022-05-19

摘要: 现有压缩机用板弹簧刚度小、使用数量多,因此设计了一种盘簧。采用有限元法(FEM)对比了盘簧和柔性板弹簧的刚度,并从8种不同臂形的盘簧中确定了3种性能较优的臂形;分析了弹簧组的9种布置方式,发现将盘簧放置在两等厚柔性板弹簧之间时支撑性能较好;采用响应面目标优化法对弹簧组间距进行优化,优化后的径向刚度增大了37.5%;对优化后的弹簧组刚度进行了实验测试,并将其与FEM结果进行了对比。

关键词: 线性压缩机, 盘簧, 布置方式, 刚度

Abstract: The existing leaf springs for compressors, which were used in a large number, had low stiffness, so a discoid spring was designed. Stiffness performance of discoid springs and flexible leaf springs were compared by FEM(finit element melhod), and 3 arm shapes with better performance were chosen from 8 different arm shapes of discoid springs. 9 different layout modes of the spring group were analyzed and it is found that the discoid spring placed between two flexible leaf springs with equal thickness show better performance. Response surface objective optimization method was used to optimize the distance of the springs in spring groups. After optimization, the radial stiffness is increased as 37.5%. The stiffness of the optimized spring group were tested and compared with the FEM results. 

Key words: linear compressor, discoid spring, layout mode, stiffness

中图分类号: