考虑性能稳定性的机械系统可靠性分配方法研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-132X.2024.05.007

中国机械工程 ›› 2024, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (05): 821-828,850.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-132X.2024.05.007

考虑性能稳定性的机械系统可靠性分配方法研究

李健1,2;王宏伟3;慕宗燚3;杜彦斌1;冉琰4

1.重庆工商大学智能装备绿色设计与制造重庆市重点实验室,重庆,400067
2.重庆工商大学机械工程学院,重庆,400067
3.重庆文理学院智能制造工程学院，重庆，402160
4.重庆大学机械与运载工程学院，重庆， 400044

出版日期:2024-05-25 发布日期:2024-06-26
作者简介:李健，男，1987年生，博士、讲师。研究方向为机电产品精度及可靠性分析。E-mail:lijian2022@ctbu.edu.cn。
基金资助:
重庆市自然科学基金（CSTB2022NSCQ-MSX1451）；重庆市教委科学技术研究项目（KJQN202200813）；重庆工商大学科学研究项目（2256012）；重庆市高校创新研究群体项目(CXQT21024)；重庆英才计划(CQYC20210302226); 重庆英才计划“包干制项目”(cstc2022ycjh-bgzxm0056)

Research on Reliability Allocation Method for Mechanical Systems Considering Performance Stability

LI Jian1,2;WANG Hongwei3;MU Zongyi3;DU Yanbin1;RAN Yan4

1.Chongqing Key Laboratory of Green Design and Manufacturing of Intelligent Equipment,
Chongqing Technology and Business University,Chongqing,400067
2.College of Mechanical Engineering,Chongqing Technology and Business University,
Chongqing,400067
3.School of Intelligent Manufacturing Engineering,Chongqing University of Arts and Sciences,
Chongqing,402106
4.College of Mechanical and Vehicle Engineering,Chongqing University,Chongqing,400044

Online:2024-05-25 Published:2024-06-26

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对机械系统可靠性分配，提出了一种考虑性能稳定性的可靠性分配方法。引入元动作理论对机械系统进行结构分解，以元动作单元为分配对象，建立元动作可靠性二层综合评价指标模型，结合多准则决策(MCDM) 方法，得到元动作可靠性分配系数；然后建立机械传动系统稳定性模型，并计算各个元动作对系统性能稳定性的影响系数；最后，利用性能稳定性的影响系数对可靠性分配系数进行修正，实现机械系统可靠性的合理分配。通过与传统方法进行对比，验证了所提方法的有效性。

关键词: 多准则决策, 机械系统, 可靠性分配, 性能稳定性, 元动作

Abstract: Considering performance stability, a reliability allocation method was proposed for mechanical system reliability allocation. The meta-action theory was introduced to decompose the structures of mechanical system and the meta-action unit was used as allocation object, a two-level comprehensive evaluation index model for meta-action reliability was established. Combining with the MCDM method, the reliability allocation coefficients of meta-action were obtained. Then, a stability model for the mechanical transmission system was established and the influence coefficient of each meta-action on the system performance stability was calculated. Finally, the reliability allocation coefficients were modified by using the influence coefficient of performance stability and a reasonable allocation of mechanical system reliability was achieved. By comparing with the traditional methods, the effectiveness of the proposed method was verified.

Key words: , multi criteria decision making(MCDM), mechanical system, reliability allocation, performance stability, meta-action

中图分类号:

TH123

李健1, 2, 王宏伟3, 慕宗燚3, 杜彦斌1, 冉琰4. 考虑性能稳定性的机械系统可靠性分配方法研究[J]. 中国机械工程, 2024, 35(05): 821-828,850.

LI Jian1, 2, WANG Hongwei3, MU Zongyi3, DU Yanbin1, RAN Yan4. Research on Reliability Allocation Method for Mechanical Systems Considering Performance Stability[J]. China Mechanical Engineering, 2024, 35(05): 821-828,850.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://www.cmemo.org.cn/CN/10.3969/j.issn.1004-132X.2024.05.007

http://www.cmemo.org.cn/CN/Y2024/V35/I05/821

参考文献

［1］CHANG K H. A More General Reliability Allocation Method Using the Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Set and Minimal Variance Owga Weights［J］. Applied Soft Computing, 2017, 56:589-596
［2］刘英, 余武, 李岳, 等. 基于区间灰色系统理论的可靠性分配［J］. 中国机械工程, 2015, 26(11):1521-1526.
LIU Ying, YU Wu, LI Yue, et al. Reliability Allocation Based on Interval Analysis and Grey System Theory［J］. China Mechanical Engineering, 2015, 26(11):1521-1526.
［3］LIU W, ZENG Q, WAN L, et al. A Comprehensive Method of Apportioning Reliability Goals for New Product of Hydraulic Excavator［J］. Mathema-tical Problems in Engineering, 2019, 2019:1-11
［4］YU X, LIANG W, ZHANG L, et al. Risk Assessment of the Maintenance Process for Onshore Oil and Gas Transmission Pipelines under Uncertainty［J］. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2018, 177:50-67.
［5］张强, 李坚, 谢里阳, 等. 考虑二层因素影响的综合因子可靠性分配法［J］. 中国机械工程, 2019, 30(19):2301-2305.
ZHANG Qiang, LI Jian, XIE Liyang, et al. Integrated Factor Reliability Allocation Method Considering Influences of Two-layer Factors［J］. China Mechanical Engineering, 2019, 30(19):2301-2305.
［6］BAI B, LI Z, ZHANG J, et al. Research on Multiple-state Industrial Robot System with Epistemic Uncertainty Reliability Allocation Method［J］. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 2021, 37(2):632-647.
［7］DU Y B, WU G A, TANG Y, et al. Reliability Allocation Method for Remanufactured Machine Tools Based on Fuzzy Evaluation Importance and Failure Influence［J］. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing—Green Technology, 2021, 8(6):1617-1628.
［8］CAO Y, LIU S, FANG Z, et al. Reliability Improvement Allocation Method Considering Common Cause Failures［J］. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 2020, 69(2):571-580.
［9］LI Y L, ZHANG G B, WANG Y, et al. Research on Reliability Allocation Technology for NC Machine Tool Meta-action［J］. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 2019, 35(6):2016-2044.
［10］YU H, ZHANG G B, RAN Y, et al. A Reliability Allocation Method for Mechanical Product Based on Meta-action［J］. IEEE Transactions on Reliabi-lity, 2020, 69(1):373-381.
［11］CHEN Y F, RAN Y, WANG Z, et al. Meta-action Reliability-based Mechanical Product Optimization Design under Uncertainty Environment［J］. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2021, 100:104174.
［12］陈一凡, 张根保, 冉琰, 等. 面向元动作的机械传动系统可靠性分配方法［J］. 中国机械工程, 2021, 32(17):2032-2039.
CHEN Yifan, ZHANG Genbao, RAN Yan, et al. Research on Meta-action-oriented Reliability Allocation Method of Mechanical Transmission System［J］. China Mechanical Engineering, 2021, 32(17):2032-2039.
［13］ZHANG W, DU Y B, ZHU Q. A Hybrid Approach for Reliability Allocation of Nc Machine Tool Based on Meta-action［J］. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2023, 127(9/10):4067-4079.
［14］LI Y L, ZHANG X G, RAN Y, et al. Research on Meta-action Decomposition and Meta-action Unit Modeling Technology for Electromechanical Pro-duct［J］. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 2020, 36(1):268-284.
［15］张生永,冉琰,张根保,等.精度保持性定量评价与精度退化机理分析［J］.机械工程学报,2022,58(7):193-213.
ZHANG Shengyong, RAN Yan, ZHANG Genbao, et al. Quantitative Evaluation of Accuracy Retentivity and Analysis of Accuracy Degradation Mechanism［J］. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2022,58(7):193-213.
［16］李健,冉琰,张根保,等.机械传动系统运动精度优化分配新方法［J］.中国机械工程, 2022, 33(9):1034-1043.
LI Jian, RAN Yan, ZHANG Genbao, et al. Optimal Distribution of Motion Precision of Mechanical Transmission System Based on Meta Action［J］. China Mechanical Engineering, 2022,33(9):1034-1043.
［17］李健,张根保,冉琰,等.基于自由度约束的元动作单元误差传递路径识别方法［J］.中国机械工程,2023,34(2):135-141.
LI Jian, ZHANG Genbao, RAN Yan, et al. Error Transfer Path Identification Method of Meta-action Unit Based on Degree of Freedom Constraint［J］. China Mechanical Engineering, 2023,34(2):135-141.
［18］HUANG G Q, XIAO L M, ZHANG G B. Improved Failure Mode and Effect Analysis with Interval-valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Rough Number Theory［J］. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2020, 95:103856.
［19］XIAO L M, HUANG G Q, ZHANG G B, et al. A Failure Tracing Method with Hierarchical Digraph and Meta Action for Complex Electro-mechanical Systems［J］. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 2022, 38(5):2622-2648.
［20］KUMA K, CHEN S M. Multi Attribute Decision Making Based on Interval-valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Values, Score Function of Connection Numbers, and the Set Pair Analysis Theory［J］. Information Sciences, 2021, 551:100-112.
［21］YE J. Expected Value Method for Intuitionistic Trapezoidal Fuzzy Multi Criteria Decision-making Problems［J］. Expert Systems with Applications, 2011, 38(9):11730-11734.
［22］LIANG C, ZHAO S, ZHANG J. Aggregation Operators on Triangular Intuitionistic Fuzzy Numbers and Its Application to Multi-criteria Decision Making Problems［J］. Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences, 2014, 39(3):189-208.

[1]	张威1, 2, 谢俊1, 杜彦斌1, 冉琰3, 张根保3, 4. 考虑双重不确定性的机械产品元动作可靠性分配方法[J]. 中国机械工程, 2024, 35(05): 802-810.
[2]	李健, 慕宗燚, 杜彦斌, 黄广全, 冉琰. 基于元动作的数控机床可用性分析方法研究[J]. 中国机械工程, 2023, 34(15): 1848-1855.
[3]	张策, 杨廷力, 刘建琴. 机器组成概念从近代到现代的演变[J]. 中国机械工程, 2023, 34(10): 1135-1139.
[4]	李健, 张根保, 冉琰, 王勇勤. 基于自由度约束的元动作单元误差传递路径识别方法[J]. 中国机械工程, 2023, 34(02): 135-141.
[5]	庹军波, 彭秋媛, 张贤明, 李聪波. 工业机器人能耗预测研究[J]. 中国机械工程, 2022, 33(22): 2727-2732,2740.
[6]	李健, 冉琰, 张根保, 王勇勤. 机械传动系统运动精度优化分配新方法[J]. 中国机械工程, 2022, 33(09): 1034-1043.
[7]	陈一凡, 张根保, 冉琰, 李宇龙, 庾辉, . 面向元动作的机械传动系统可靠性分配方法[J]. 中国机械工程, 2021, 32(17): 2032-2039.
[8]	郭磊, 刘检华, 张佳朋, 李夏禹, 张秀敏, 夏焕雄. 航天工业中胶接技术的研究现状分析[J]. 中国机械工程, 2021, 32(12): 1395-1405.
[9]	李聪波;尹誉先;肖溱鸽;龙云;赵希坤. 数据驱动下基于元动作的数控车削能耗预测方法[J]. 中国机械工程, 2020, 31(21): 2601-2611.
[10]	杨斌, 冉琰, 张根保. [可靠性建模及试验技术]基于元动作模块的多轴数控机床精度分析[J]. 中国机械工程, 2020, 31(13): 1621-1628.
[11]	鞠萍华, 陈资, 冉琰, 肖兵. [装配技术]基于偏最小二乘回归的运动机构装配质量关键控制点判定方法[J]. 中国机械工程, 2020, 31(13): 1562-1569.
[12]	张强;李坚;谢里阳;何雪浤. 考虑二层因素影响的综合因子可靠性分配法[J]. 中国机械工程, 2019, 30(19): 2301-2305.
[13]	张根保;王扬. 基于元动作链理论的数控机床故障分析[J]. 中国机械工程, 2019, 30(16): 1950-1958,1966.
[14]	王昊, 张义民, 杨, 周, 周雁迅. 基于FMECA修正危害度的数控车床关键子系统可靠性分配[J]. 中国机械工程, 2016, 27(14): 1936-1941.
[15]	程贤福, 李骏, 徐尤南, 朱启航. 基于公理设计的机械系统稳健性分析及应用[J]. 中国机械工程, 2015, 26(6): 721-728.

考虑性能稳定性的机械系统可靠性分配方法研究

Research on Reliability Allocation Method for Mechanical Systems Considering Performance Stability

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics