中国机械工程 ›› 2022, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (17): 2125-2132.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-132X.2022.17.014

• 工程前沿 • 上一篇    下一篇

钢轨砂带打磨与砂轮打磨综合性能对比实验研究

吴志伟1,2;樊文刚1,2;王谦3;刘弋1,2;马腾飞1,2   

  1. 1.北京交通大学机械与电子控制工程学院,北京,100044
    2.北京交通大学载运工具先进制造与测控技术教育部重点实验室,北京,100044
    3.中国铁路乌鲁木齐局集团有限公司,乌鲁木齐,830011
  • 出版日期:2022-09-10 发布日期:2022-09-23
  • 通讯作者: 樊文刚(通信作者),男,1985年生,副教授、博士研究生导师。研究方向为数字化制造技术与装备。钢轨智能养护技术与装备。发表论文约40篇。E-mail:wgfan@bjtu.edu.cn。
  • 作者简介:吴志伟,男,1994年生,博士研究生。研究方向为先进加工与智能制造。E-mail:1756832926@qq.com。
  • 基金资助:
    中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(2019JBM050)

Experimental Investigation on Comprehensive Performance Comparison for Rail Grinding Using Abrasive Belt and Abrasive Wheel

WU Zhiwei1,2;FAN Wengang1,2;WANG Qian3;LIU Yi1,2;MA Tengfei1,2   

  1. 1.School of Mechanical,Electronic and Control Engineering,Beijing Jiaotong University,
    Beijing,100044
    2.Key Laboratory of Vehicle Advanced Manufacturing,Measuring and Control Technology,
    Ministey of Education,Beijing Jiaotong University,Beijing,100044
    3.China Railway Urumqi Group Co.,Ltd.,Urumqi,830011
  • Online:2022-09-10 Published:2022-09-23

摘要: 基于自主研发的锂电驱动钢轨砂带打磨机和砂轮打磨机,以60N型钢轨廓形作为实验对象,全面对比了新型钢轨砂带打磨技术和传统砂轮打磨技术的性能。结果表明:当打磨压力在45~75 N范围内时,砂带打磨的材料去除率约为砂轮打磨的15~30倍,而当压力增大到90 N时,砂带打磨的材料去除率高达砂轮打磨的102倍;砂带打磨的振动加速度、噪声和能耗均小于砂轮打磨;砂带打磨切屑为带状,而砂轮打磨则表现为高温熔融状,同时当打磨压力增大到105 N时,砂轮打磨后钢轨表面会出现发蓝现象,而砂带打磨不会;此外,砂带打磨的横向表面粗糙度大于砂轮打磨,最高可达8 μm,但满足中国铁路钢轨养护要求的最大值10 μm。综上,钢轨砂带打磨技术在材料去除率、振动、噪声、能耗和温度等方面显著优于传统砂轮打磨技术,预期将成为工程实际中解决钢轨严重病害问题的有效方法之一。

关键词: 钢轨打磨, 砂带, 砂轮, 材料去除, 振动, 能耗

Abstract: Based on the self-developed lithium battery-driven rail abrasive belt and abrasive wheel grinding machine, the 60N rail profile was used as the experimental objects to comprehensively compare the performance of the new rail belt grinding technology and the traditional grinding wheel grinding technology. The results show that when the grinding pressure is in the range of 45 to 75 N, the material removal rate of abrasive belt grinding is about 15 to 30 times that of abrasive wheel grinding, while when the pressure is increased to 90 N, the material removal rate of abrasive belt grinding is as high as 102 times that of abrasive wheel grinding. The vibration acceleration, noise and energy consumption of abrasive belt grinding are less than that of abrasive wheel grinding. The abrasive belt grinding chips are banded, while the abrasive wheel grinding chips are molten at high temperature. At the same time, when the grinding pressure is increased to 105 N, the rail surface will turn blue after grinding, but the abrasive belt grinding will not. In addition, the lateral surface roughness of abrasive belt grinding is greater than that of abrasive wheel grinding, up to 8 μm, which meets the maximum 10 μm required by Chinese railway rail maintenance. To sum up, rail abrasive belt grinding technology is significantly superior to traditional abrasive wheel grinding technology in material removal rate, vibration, noise, energy consumption and temperature, etc. It is expected to be one of the effective methods to solve serious rail diseases in engineering practices. 

Key words: rail grinding, abrasive belt, abrasive wheel, material removal, vibration, energy consumption

中图分类号: