[1]Pusavec F, Krajnik P, Kopac J. Transitioning to Sustainable Production-Part I: Application on Machining Technologies[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2010, 18(2): 174-184.
[2]Pusavec F, Kramar D, Krajnik P, et al. Transitioning to Sustainable Production-Part II: Evaluation of Sustainable Machining Technologies[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production , 2010, 18(12): 1211-1221.
[3]Balogun V A, Mativenga P T. Modelling of Direct Energy Requirements in Mechanical Machining Processes[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production , 2013, 41: 179-186.
[4]Bhushan R K. Optimization of Cutting Parameters for Minimizing Power Consumption and Maximizing Tool Life during Machining of Al Alloy SiC Particle Composites[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2013, 39: 242-254.
[5]Gutowski T, Dahmus J, Thiriez A. Electrical Ener-gy Requirements for a Manufacturing Process[C]//Proceedings of 13th CIRP International Conference on Life Cycle Engineering . Leuven, 2006.
[6]Rajemi M F, Mativenga P T, Aramcharoen A. Sustainable Machining: Selection of Optimum Turning Conditions Based on Minimum Energy Considerations[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2010, 18(10/11): 1059-1065.
[7]He Y, Liu F, Wu T, et al. Analysis and Estimation of Energy Consumption for Numerical Control Machining[J]. Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 2012, 226(B2): 255-266.
[8]Li W, Kara S. An Empirical Model for Predicting Energy Consumption of Manufacturing Processes: a Case of Turning Process[J]. Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 2011, 225(B9): 1636-1646.
[9]Draganescu F, Gheorghe M, Doicin C V. Models of Machine Tool Efficiency and Specific Consumed Energy[J]. J. Mat. Proc. Tech., 2003,141(1):9-15.
[10]Fratila D, Caizar C. Application of Taguchi Meth-od to Selection of Optimal Lubrication and Cutting Conditions in Face Milling of AlMg3[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production , 2011, 19(6/7): 640-645.
[11]Dhar N R, Ahmed M T, Islam S. An Experimen-tal Investigation on Effect of Minimum Quantity Lubrication in Machining AISI 1040 Steel[J]. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., 2007, 47: 748-753.
[12]Devillez A, Schneider F, Dominiak S. Cutting For-ces and Wear in Dry Machining of Inconel 718 with Coated Carbide Tools[J]. Wear, 2007, 262(7/8): 931-942.
[13]Shashidhara Y M, Jayaram S R. Vegetable Oils as a Potential Cutting Fluid - An Evolution[J]. Trib. Int., 2010, 43(5/6): 1073-1081.
[14]Campatelli G. Reducing the Environmental Footpr-int of Machining Operations[C]//HSS Forum 2013. Florence, 2013:309-316.
[15]Montgomery D C. Design, Analysis of Experiments[M]. 5th ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons,2001.
[16]Hicks C R. Fundamental Concepts in the Design of Experiments[M]. 4th ed. Holt: Saunders College Publishing, 1993.
[17]Fnides B, Yallese M A, Mabrouki T, et al. Application of Response Surface Methodology for Determining Cutting Force Model in Turning Hardened AISIH11 Hot Work Tool Steel[J].Sadhana, 2011, 36(1): 109-123.
[18]Horng J T, Liu N M, Chiang K T. Investigating the Machinability Evaluation of Hadfield Steel in the Hard Turning with Al2O3/TiC Mixed Ceramic Tool Based on the Response Surface Methodology[J]. J. Mat. Proc. Tech., 2008(3): 532-541.
[19]Kuram E, Ozcelik B, Bayramoglu M, et al. Optimization of Cutting Fluids and Cutting Parameters during End Milling by Using D-optimal Design of Experiments[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2013, 42: 159-166.
[20]Noordin M Y, Venkatesh V C, Sharif S, et al. Application of Response Surface Methodology in Describing the Performance of Coated Carbide Tools when Turning AISI 1045 Steel[J]. J. Mat. Proc. Tech., 2004, 145: 46-58.
[21]Mori M, Fujishima M, Inamasu Y, et al. A Study on Energy Efficiency Improvement for Machine Tools[J]. CIRP Ann-Manuf. Tech., 2011, 60: 145-148.
[22]Diaz N, Redelsheimer E, Dornfeld D. Energy Con-sumption Characterization and Rreduction Strategies for Milling Machine Tool Use[C]//Geoloc. Sol. for Sust. in Manuf.-Proc. of the 18th CIRP Int. Conf. on Life Cycle Eng.. Braunschweig, 2011: 263-267.
|