基于质量屋与排序组织法的产品概念决策方法

中国机械工程 ›› 2014, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (18): 2496-2500.

基于质量屋与排序组织法的产品概念决策方法

郭茜;王增强;蒲云

西南交通大学，峨嵋，614202

出版日期:2014-09-25 发布日期:2014-09-26
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目（51278429）；中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目（10501B10096015）；西南交通大学峨眉校区高层次人才经费专项（10501X10096013）

Product Design Alternative Selection:an Integrated Approach with HOQ and PROMETHEE

Guo Qian;Wang Zengqiang;Pu Yun

Southwest Jiaotong University,Emei,Sichuan,614202

Online:2014-09-25 Published:2014-09-26
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China（No. 51278429）;Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities( No. 10501B10096015 )

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为了在选择概念设计方案时实现顾客需求与专家经验知识的协调决策，提出基于质量屋与排序组织法的产品概念决策方法。通过模糊质量屋的关联矩阵与自相关矩阵进行顾客需求向产品技术特征的转换，将概念方案决策矩阵建立于质量屋的输出结果之后，利用所输出的技术特征权重值进行模糊排序组织法的综合排序，排序组织法所使用的偏好函数由专家根据产品的技术特点构造。以实例说明了所提方法的可行性和有效性。

关键词: 概念决策, 质量功能配置, 质量屋, 排序组织法

Abstract:

In order to select conceptual design schemes through coordination between customer requirements and experience knowledge, an integrated approach combining HOQ and PROMETHEE was proposed. The correlation matrix and autocorrelation matrix of fuzzy HOQ were utilized to realize the transformation from customer requirements to technical characteristics. The conceptual decision matrix was established after the HOQ outputs to use the fuzzy weights of technical characteristics to conduct comprehensive ranking of fuzzy PROMETHEE, where preference functions were constructed according to expert knowledge. A case study shows the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed method.

Key words: design alternative selection, quality function deployment, house of quality(HOQ), preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluation(PROMETHEE) method

中图分类号:

郭茜, 王增强, 蒲云. 基于质量屋与排序组织法的产品概念决策方法[J]. 中国机械工程, 2014, 25(18): 2496-2500.

Guo Qian, Wang Zengqiang, Pu Yun. Product Design Alternative Selection:an Integrated Approach with HOQ and PROMETHEE[J]. China Mechanical Engineering, 2014, 25(18): 2496-2500.

参考文献

[1]乌尔里克, 埃平格. 产品设计与开发[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2005.
[2]Paul G, Beitz W. Engineering Design[M].London: The Design Council, 1984.
[3]Yeo S H, Mak M W, Balon S A P. Analysis of Decision-making Methodologies for Desirability Score of Conceptual Design[J]. Journal of Engineering Design, 2004, 15(2): 195-208.
[4]Ayag Z. An Intergrated Approach to Evaluating Conceptual Design Alternatives in a New Development Environment[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2005, 43(4): 687-713.
[5]王美清, 唐晓青. 产品设计中的用户需求与产品质量特征映射方法研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2004, 40(5): 136- 140.
Wang Meiqing, Tang Xiaoqing. Combined House of Quality Oriented Product Planning[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2004, 30(7): 652-656.
[6]车阿大, 杨明顺. 质量功能配置理论及应用[M]. 北京: 电子工业出版社, 2008.
[7]杨明顺, 林志航. QFD中顾客需求重要度确定的一种方法[J]. 管理科学学报, 2003, 6(5): 65-71.
Yang Mingshun, Lin Zhihang. Method to Determine Importance of Customers Requirements in QFD[J]. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2003, 6(5): 65-71.
[8]Liu H T. Product Design and Selection Using Fuzzy QFD and Fuzzy MCDM Approaches[J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2011, 35: 482-496.
[9]Kimita K, Shimomura Y, Arai T. Evaluation of Customer Satisfaction for PSS Design[J]. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 2009, 20(5): 654-673.
[10]Chen L H, Ko W C. A Fuzzy Nonlinear Model for Quality Function Deployment Considering Kano’s Concept[J]. Mathemathical & Computer Modeling, 2008, 48(3/4): 581-593.
[11]徐玖平, 吴巍. 多属性决策的理论与方法[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2006.
[12]Goumas M, Lygerou V. An Extension of the PROMETHEE Method for Decision Making in Fuzzyenvironment: Ranking of Alternative Energy Exploitation Projects[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2000,123: 606-613.
[13]Les E S, Li R L. Comparision of Fuzzy Numbers Based on the Probability Measure of Fuzzy Events[J]. Computer and Mathematics with Application, 1988, 15(10):887-896.
[14]金涛, 张娜. 基于改进粗糙集灰色分析的产品方案评估方法[J]. 中国机械工程, 2012, 23(18)：2200-2203.
Jin Tiao, Zhang Na. Method of Evaluating Product Concepts Based on Improved Rough Set Grey Analysis[J]. China Mechanical Engineering, 2012, 23(18)：2200-2203.