基于三角模糊数层次分析法的武器系统效能评估研究

中国机械工程 ›› 2013, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (11): 1442-1446.

基于三角模糊数层次分析法的武器系统效能评估研究

吴军1;董星1;方强2;陈志敏2;曾畅1

1.华中科技大学,武汉,430074
2.中国舰船研究设计中心,武汉,430064

出版日期:2013-06-10 发布日期:2013-06-04
基金资助:
中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目 (2011QN085)；高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金资助项目(20100142120076)；国家科技支撑计划资助项目(2012BAF02B01)
Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities( No.2011QN085);

Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China（No. 20100142120076）;
The National Key Technology R&D Program（No. 2012BAF02B01）

A Novel Effectiveness Assessment Method of Weapon System Based on Triangular Fuzzy Number Analytic Hierarchy Process

Wu Jun1;Dong Xin1;Fang Qiang2;Chen Zhimin2;Zeng Chang1

1.Huazhong University of Science and Technology,Wuhan,430074
2.China Ship Development and Design Center,Wuhan,430064

Online:2013-06-10 Published:2013-06-04
Supported by:

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities( No.2011QN085);

Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China

（No. 20100142120076）;
The National Key Technology R&D Program（No. 2012BAF02B01）

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

针对武器系统效能评估中技战术指标众多且量纲繁杂、专家打分存在不确定性等问题,综合运用效用函数和三角模糊数层次分析法等理论,提出了一种武器系统效能评估新方法。建立了武器系统效能评估的递阶层次结构模型与数学模型,提出了指标层效能量化方法和系统效能权重计算方法,并给出了武器系统效能评估过程的UML序列图。最后,以某型鱼雷为例对其打击效能进行了综合评估。

关键词: 效能评估, 三角模糊数, 层次分析法, 专家打分

Abstract:

In order to deal with the problems such as performance index in large and expert scoring uncertainty during the effectiveness assessment of weapon system, a novel effectiveness assessment method was proposed herein using the utility function and triangular fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. First of all, the hierarchical structure model and its mathematical model of weapon system effectiveness assessment were built. Furthermore, a quantitative method used in performance index layer and a computational method of system comprehensive weight was proposed respectively. Meanwhile, the whole process to assess weapon system effectiveness was described using unified modeling language(UML) sequence diagram. Finally, a case study on torpedo was implemented.

Key words: effectiveness assessment, triangular fuzzy number, analytic hierarchy process, expert scoring

中图分类号:

TP391. 9

吴军1, 董星1, 方强2, 陈志敏2, 曾畅1. 基于三角模糊数层次分析法的武器系统效能评估研究[J]. 中国机械工程, 2013, 24(11): 1442-1446.

TUN Jun-1, DONG Xing-1, FANG Jiang-2, CHEN Zhi-Min-2, CENG Chang-1. A Novel Effectiveness Assessment Method of Weapon System Based on Triangular Fuzzy Number Analytic Hierarchy Process[J]. China Mechanical Engineering, 2013, 24(11): 1442-1446.

参考文献

[1]郭齐胜, 郅志刚, 杨瑞平. 装备效能评估概论[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2005.
[2]García-Cascales M S,Lamata M T. Selection of a Cleaning System for Engine Maintenance Based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2009, 56(4): 1442-1451.
[3]Wang J R, Fan K, Wang W S. Integration of Fuzzy AHP and FPP with TOPSIS Methodology for Aeroengine Health Assessment[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2010, 37(12): 8516-8526.
[4]Lee J, Kang S H, Rosenberger J, et al. A Hybrid Approach of Goal Programming for Weapon Systems Selection[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2010, 58(3): 521-527.
[5]李浩,王公宝.基于模糊AHP评判的外军航母编队作战效能评估[J].兵工自动化,2009,28(3):26-28.
Li Hao,Wang Gongbao.Operational Effectiveness Evaluation of Foreign Army’s Aircraft Carrier Formation Based on Fuzzy AHP Comprehensive Evaluation[J].Ordnance Industry Automation,2009,28(3):26-28.
[6]白松浩. 系统效能指数和效能因子的计算模型与方法[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2010, 30(11): 2112-2120.
Bai Songhao.Computational Model and Method for System Effectiveness Index and Factor[J].Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice,2010,30(11):2112-2120.
[7]董彦非, 王礼沅, 王卓健, 等. 基于空战模式和AHP法的空战效能评估模型[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2006, 28(6): 885-888.
Dong Yanfei, Wang Liyuan, Wang Zhuojian, et al. Air Combat Effectiveness Assessment Model Based on Operational Pattern and Analytic Hierarchy Process[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2006, 28(6): 885-888.
[8]吴军, 邓超. 基于UML的LCA中产品系统的建模研究[J]. 华中科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2004, 32(4): 21-23.
Wu Jun, Deng Chao. Research of Modeling Product System in LCA Based on UML[J]. J. Huazhong Univ. of Sci. & Tech.(Nature Science Edition), 2004, 32(4): 21-23.
[9]宋保维. 鱼雷系统工程原理和方法[M]. 西安: 西北工业大学出版社, 2001.
[10]贾跃, 宋保维, 梁庆卫. 鱼雷武器系统效能评估模型及其仿真[J]. 兵工学报, 2006, 27(3): 475-479.
Jia Yue, Song Baowei, Liang Qingwei. Mathematical Model and Simulation of Torpedo Weapon System Effectiveness Evaluation[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2006, 27(3): 475-479.

[1]	武春龙, 朱天明, 张鹏, 孙建广, 檀润华, . [数据驱动的产品设计]基于功能模型和层次分析法的智能产品服务系统概念方案构建[J]. 中国机械工程, 2020, 31(07): 853-864,870.
[2]	徐立友, 李晴, 周志立. 一种改进遗传算法在离合器参数优化中的应用[J]. 中国机械工程, 2015, 26(24): 3307-3311,3317.
[3]	巴黎, 李言, 杨明顺, 刘永, 高新勤. 考虑不确定加工时间的工艺规划与调度集成问题研究[J]. 中国机械工程, 2015, 26(24): 3348-3355.
[4]	凌平, 罗晨, 苏春. 基于层次分析法的智能夹具规划算法[J]. 中国机械工程, 2015, 26(15): 2109-2117.
[5]	尤飞1;胡庆夕2;朱晓锦2. 再生骨支架内部结构性能的综合评价[J]. 中国机械工程, 2013, 24(20): 2768-2774.
[6]	赵又群;刘英杰. 基于改进模糊层次分析法的汽车操纵稳定性主观综合评价[J]. 中国机械工程, 2013, 24(18): 2519-2523.
[7]	杨述明, 邱静, 刘冠军. 面向装备健康管理的监测参数选择与健康评估方法研究[J]. 中国机械工程, 2012, 23(13): 1513-1517.
[8]	周丹1, 刘光复1, 何平1, 2. 基于优选级评定的能量设计因子耦合分解机制[J]. 中国机械工程, 2012, 23(12): 1393-1399.
[9]	王正成, 谢先文. 基于FAHP和改进蚁群算法的网络化制造资源链构建研究[J]. 中国机械工程, 2012, 23(12): 1487-1492.
[10]	朱春生, 张琦, 冉红亮, 焦玉民. 工程装备测试性综合评价方法研究 [J]. 中国机械工程, 2011, 22(9): 1044-1048.
[11]	朱德馨, 刘宏昭. 基于改进的模糊层次分析法的电主轴可靠性分配 [J]. 中国机械工程, 2011, 22(24): 2923-2927.
[12]	赵延明, 刘德顺, 徐小艳, 张俊. 面向零件公差设计的产品质量损失成本模型 [J]. 中国机械工程, 2011, 22(11): 1347-1351.
[13]	宾光富;;周元;Balbir;S.;Dhillon;. 基于Fuzzy-AHP的机械设备多特征参数健康状态综合评价研究[J]. J4, 2009, 20(20): 0-2519.
[14]	张书亭;高曙明;杨友东;;陈翔;. 自顶向下协同装配设计中的耦合结构参数协同计算[J]. J4, 2009, 20(12): 0-1511.
[15]	张静;李柏林;刘永均;. 基于AHP的多学科设计优化可行解的满意评价方法[J]. J4, 2009, 20(08): 0-886.