产品规划中基于市场竞争的关联关系强度估计

中国机械工程 ›› 2011, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (13): 1564-1570.

产品规划中基于市场竞争的关联关系强度估计

李延来1;雒兴刚1;韩毅2;姚建明3

1.东北大学流程工业综合自动化教育部重点实验室,沈阳,110004

2.浙江工业大学,杭州,310023;3.中国人民大学,北京,100872

出版日期:2011-07-10 发布日期:2011-07-14
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(70721001，70871020，70971017)
National Natural Science Foundation of China（No. 70721001，70871020，70971017）

Determination of Functional Relationship Measures in Product Planning Based on Competitive Evaluations

Li Yanlai1;Luo Xinggang1;Han Yi2;Yao Jianming3

1.Key Lab of Integrated Automation of Process Industry of MOE, Northeastern University, Shenyang, 110004

2.Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, 310023

3.Renmin University of China, Beijing, 100872

Online:2011-07-10 Published:2011-07-14
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China（No. 70721001，70871020，70971017）

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

在质量屋的构建过程中,顾客需求与工程特性之间关联关系强度的估计是一个关键步骤。针对该关联关系强度具有多属性决策的特征,提出了面向竞争评价的质量屋中关联关系强度的估计方法。在该方法中,首先对本企业及其竞争对手的产品进行竞争性评价,以获得规范化的顾客需求和工程特性的竞争性评价;其次,根据这些竞争性评价,利用多属性决策方法建立相应于每一项顾客需求的工程特性重要度的优化模型,并通过拉格朗日函数来求解这些模型;最后,引入顾客需求与工程特性之间关联关系的类型因子概念,确定顾客需求与工程特性之间的关联关系强度。以某企业单缸洗衣机的产品设计为实例,说明该方法的应用。

关键词:

质量功能配置, 顾客需求, 工程特性, 关联关系强度

Abstract:

Determination of FRMs between CRs and engineering characteristics ECs is a crucial step in constructing house of quality (HOQ). Because the multiple attribute decision making characteristic of the FRMs, an integrated approach for determining the FRMs was proposed by exploiting competitive evaluations. Firstly, to acquire the competitive evaluations of CRs and ECs, the products of a company and its competitors were evaluated; secondly, according to these competitive evaluations, a model for determining the importance ratings of ECs corresponding to every CR was built by using multiple attribute decision making(MADM) method, and this model was resolved by using Lagrange function; lastly, by introducing a concept of type gene of a functional relationship, the FRMs between CRs and ECs were determined. A case study of product development of a singular-vat washing machine in a company was provided to illustrate the application of the presented approach. 

Key words: quality function deployment, customer requirement(CR), engineering characteristic(EC), functional relationship measure(FRM)

中图分类号:

李延来1, 雒兴刚1, 韩毅2, 姚建明3.

产品规划中基于市场竞争的关联关系强度估计

[J]. 中国机械工程, 2011, 22(13): 1564-1570.

LI Yan-Lai-1, LUO Xin-Gang-1, HAN Yi-2, TAO Jian-Meng-3.

Determination of Functional Relationship Measures in Product Planning Based on Competitive Evaluations

[J]. China Mechanical Engineering, 2011, 22(13): 1564-1570.

参考文献

[1]Prasad B. Reviews of QFD and Related Deploy- ments Techniques [J]. Journal of Manufacturing Science Engineering in the ASME, 1998, 17(3):221-234.
[2]王美清[1],唐晓青[1].一种面向产品规划过程的组合质量屋[J].北京航空航天大学学报:652-656.
[3]Zheng L Y, Chin K S. QFD--based Optimal Process Quality Planning[J]. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2005, 26 (7/8) : 831-841.
[4]车阿大,杨明顺.质量功能配置理论及应用[M].北京:电子工业出版社,2008.
[5]Chan L K, Wu M L. Prioritizing the Technical Measures in Quality Function Deployment [J]. Quality Engineering, 1998, 10(3): 467-79.
[6]Chan L K, Wu M L. Quality Function Deploy- ment: a Comprehensive Review of Its Concepts and Methods[J]. Quality Engineering, 2002, 15(1) : 23-35.
[7]Chan L K, Wu M L. A Systematic Approach to Quality Function Deployment with a Full Illustra- tive Example[J]. Omega, 2005, 33(1):119-139.
[8]Hauser J R, Clausing D. The House of Quality[J]. Harvard Business Review, 1988, 66(3): 63-73.
[9]徐宣国[1],李向阳[1],李辉[1],王颜新[1].基于资源观的虚拟企业组建决策支持系统的构架[J].中国机械工程:1312-1316.
[10]Dawson D, Askin R G. Optimal New Product De- sign Using Quality Function Deployment with Em- pirical Value Functions[J].Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 1999, 15 (1) : 17-32.
[11]Kumar P, Barua P B, Gaindhar J L. Quality Opti- mization(Multi -- characteristics) Through Tagu- chi~s Technique and Utility Concept[J].Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 2000, 16 (2) : 475-485.
[12]Kim K J, Moskowitiz H, Dhingra A, et al. Fuzzy Multi--criteria Models for Quality Function De- ployment[J].European Journal of Operational Re- search, 2000, 121(2): 504-518.
[13]Fung R Y K, Chen Y, Tang J F. Estimating the Functional Relationships for Quality Function De- ployment Under Uneertainties[J].Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2006, 157(1):98-120.
[14]Park T, Kim K J. Determination of an Optimal Set of Design Requirement Using House of Quality [J].Journal of Operation Management, 1998, 16 (2) : 569-581.
[15]Han C H, Kim K J, Choi S H. Prioritizing Engi- neering Characteristics in Quality Function Deploy- ment with Incomplete Information: A Linear Par- tial Ordering Approach[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2004, 91(3) :235-249.
[16]Carnevalli J A, Miguel P C. Reviews, Analysis and Classification of the Literature on QFD--types of Research, Difficulties and Benefits[J]. Interna- tional Journal of Production Economics, 2008, 114 (2) .. 737-754.
[17]李延来[1],唐加福[1],姚建明[2],蒲云[3].质量功能展开中关联关系确定的粗糙集方法[J].计算机集成制造系统,2007,13(8):1650-1657.
[18]王美清[1],唐晓青[1].产品设计中的用户需求与产品质量特征映射方法研究[J].机械工程学报,2004,40(5):136-140.
[19]Kim D H, Lee M S, Method for Generating Kim K J. A Systematic Engineering Characteristic Candidates in Quality Function Deployment[J]. International Journal of industrial Engineering, 2007, 14(2): 179-187.
[20]徐玖平,吴巍编著.多属性决策的理论与方法[M],2006:372.
[21]TangJ F, Fung R Y K, Xu B. A New Approach to Quality Function Deployment Planning with Fi- nancial Consideration[J]. Research, 2002, 29(11) Computer and Operation 1447-1463.
[22]林志航,车阿大.质量功能配置研究现状及进展——兼谈对我国QFD研究？…[J].机械科学与技术,1998,17(1):119-121.
[23]徐泽水.不确定多属性决策方法及应用[M],2004.
[24]Sireli Y, Kauffmann P, Ozan E. Integration of Kano's Model into QFD for Multiple Product De- sign[J].EEE Transaction on Engineering Man- agement, 2007, 54(2): 380-390.
[25]李延来[1],雒兴刚[1],韩毅[1],姚建明[2],焦明海[1].基于效用评价的质量功能配置中工程特性改进重要度确定的综合方法[J].计算机集成制造系统,2009,15(3):585-591.