

China Mechanical Engineering ›› 2026, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (7): 1755-1762.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-132X.2026.07.025
Previous Articles Next Articles
CHEN Wenchong1,2(
), LYU Xueting2, QI Jiehui3, LIU Hongwei4,1(
), QI Ershi4
Received:2025-08-12
Online:2026-07-25
Published:2026-08-18
Contact:
LIU Hongwei
陈文冲1,2(
), 吕雪婷2, 戚杰辉3, 刘洪伟4,1(
), 齐二石4
通讯作者:
刘洪伟
作者简介:陈文冲,男,1990年生,副教授。研究方向为工业互联网平台运营、制造服务供需匹配。发表论文20余篇。E-mail:wcchen@hdu.edu.cn基金资助:CLC Number:
CHEN Wenchong, LYU Xueting, QI Jiehui, LIU Hongwei, QI Ershi. Optimization of Platform Order Acceptance and Scheduling Considering the Portfolio of Manufacturing Service Resource Bidding Options[J]. China Mechanical Engineering, 2026, 37(7): 1755-1762.
陈文冲, 吕雪婷, 戚杰辉, 刘洪伟, 齐二石. 考虑制造资源竞拍方案组合的平台订单接收与调度优化[J]. 中国机械工程, 2026, 37(7): 1755-1762.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.cmemo.org.cn/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1004-132X.2026.07.025
| 订单数-制造资源数 | CBC | ALNS | 两邻域搜索 | 单邻域 1 | 单邻域2 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 结果 | 计算时间/s | 结果 | 计算时间/s | 结果 | 计算时间/s | 结果 | 计算时间/s | 结果 | 计算时间/s | ||||||
| 均值 | 最大值 | 均值 | 最大值 | 均值 | 最大值 | 均值 | 最大值 | ||||||||
| 小规模 | 10-8 | 1979.43 | 18.41 | 1972.2 | 1975.54 | 1411.01 | 1970.696 | 1973.03 | 2146.83 | 1949.07 | 1955.24 | 13691.66 | 1246.33 | 1246.33 | 1472.78 |
| 10-9 | 1986.05 | 16.65 | 1979.83 | 1981.4 | 9036.23 | 1978.46 | 1980.91 | 13658.30 | 1964.82 | 1967.2 | 24321.01 | 1242.62 | 1242.62 | 3840.57 | |
| 10-10 | 1982.76 | 24.63 | 1973.71 | 1976.76 | 7339.79 | 1973.36 | 1975.76 | 37070.14 | 1967.958 | 1970.76 | 55865.63 | 1235.72 | 1235.72 | 5180.72 | |
| 30-8 | 1981.18 | 179.43 | 1967.80 | 1969.91 | 8970.75 | 1967.192 | 1968.38 | 18538.49 | 1658.96 | 1712.95 | 33641.55 | 1245.67 | 1245.67 | 6237.62 | |
| 30-9 | 1987.58 | 186.29 | 1976.19 | 1978.21 | 13463.78 | 1976.09 | 1977.49 | 40155.89 | 1792.52 | 1833.6 | 18349.36 | 1314.89 | 1314.89 | 7631.34 | |
| 30-10 | 1983.77 | 376.52 | 1968.23 | 1969.58 | 16668.77 | 1967.67 | 1968.58 | 19719.9 | 1806.35 | 1884.12 | 207742.09 | 1307.17 | 1307.17 | 8112.68 | |
| 中规模 | 40-8 | 1980.43 | 553.09 | 1966.49 | 1968.20 | 11874.66 | 1963.878 | 1965.69 | 23314.46 | 1557.87 | 1615.96 | 65828.95 | 1244.54 | 1244.54 | 8653.01 |
| 40-9 | 1987.04 | 234.00 | 1975.34 | 1976.87 | 16197.83 | 1973.49 | 1975.90 | 35874.18 | 1696.878 | 1739.02 | 104785.50 | 1321.46 | 1321.46 | 12709.26 | |
| 40-10 | - | - | 1964.29 | 1966.17 | 21208.34 | 1963.89 | 1965.30 | 24826.35 | 1752.96 | 1772.77 | 249065.05 | 1334.32 | 1334.32 | 14709.26 | |
| 60-8 | 1980.02 | 751.79 | 1965.04 | 1966.42 | 9478.48 | 1962.42 | 1965.57 | 10658.92 | 1535.88 | 1550.93 | 23474.27 | 1360.98 | 1360.98 | 9709.26 | |
| 60-9 | 1985.82 | 779.44 | 1968.92 | 1969.68 | 10425.23 | 1966.95 | 1967.64 | 10708.94 | 1605.11 | 1658.14 | 31665.06 | 1290.76 | 1290.76 | 9614.38 | |
| 大规模 | 60-10 | - | - | 1961.00 | 1963.69 | 22289.53 | 1960.45 | 1961.87 | 24661.47 | 1660.77 | 1706.44 | 35475.36 | 1325.96 | 1325.96 | 14656.98 |
| 70-8 | - | - | 1962.63 | 1965.20 | 10383.73 | 1961.20 | 1963.29 | 13497.30 | 1503.72 | 1550.82 | 25337.16 | 1237.57 | 1237.57 | 12352.23 | |
| 70-9 | - | - | 1968.59 | 1970.64 | 18533.35 | 1968.24 | 1970.18 | 26888.00 | 1539.62 | 1551.00 | 56294.18 | 1239.24 | 1239.24 | 18765.90 | |
| 70-10 | - | - | 1960.34 | 1962.22 | 37647.94 | 1959.28 | 1960.53 | 48018.28 | 1647.87 | 1678.56 | 94100.07 | 1355.89 | 1355.89 | 20566.78 | |
Tab.1 results of different algorithms after 5000 generations
| 订单数-制造资源数 | CBC | ALNS | 两邻域搜索 | 单邻域 1 | 单邻域2 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 结果 | 计算时间/s | 结果 | 计算时间/s | 结果 | 计算时间/s | 结果 | 计算时间/s | 结果 | 计算时间/s | ||||||
| 均值 | 最大值 | 均值 | 最大值 | 均值 | 最大值 | 均值 | 最大值 | ||||||||
| 小规模 | 10-8 | 1979.43 | 18.41 | 1972.2 | 1975.54 | 1411.01 | 1970.696 | 1973.03 | 2146.83 | 1949.07 | 1955.24 | 13691.66 | 1246.33 | 1246.33 | 1472.78 |
| 10-9 | 1986.05 | 16.65 | 1979.83 | 1981.4 | 9036.23 | 1978.46 | 1980.91 | 13658.30 | 1964.82 | 1967.2 | 24321.01 | 1242.62 | 1242.62 | 3840.57 | |
| 10-10 | 1982.76 | 24.63 | 1973.71 | 1976.76 | 7339.79 | 1973.36 | 1975.76 | 37070.14 | 1967.958 | 1970.76 | 55865.63 | 1235.72 | 1235.72 | 5180.72 | |
| 30-8 | 1981.18 | 179.43 | 1967.80 | 1969.91 | 8970.75 | 1967.192 | 1968.38 | 18538.49 | 1658.96 | 1712.95 | 33641.55 | 1245.67 | 1245.67 | 6237.62 | |
| 30-9 | 1987.58 | 186.29 | 1976.19 | 1978.21 | 13463.78 | 1976.09 | 1977.49 | 40155.89 | 1792.52 | 1833.6 | 18349.36 | 1314.89 | 1314.89 | 7631.34 | |
| 30-10 | 1983.77 | 376.52 | 1968.23 | 1969.58 | 16668.77 | 1967.67 | 1968.58 | 19719.9 | 1806.35 | 1884.12 | 207742.09 | 1307.17 | 1307.17 | 8112.68 | |
| 中规模 | 40-8 | 1980.43 | 553.09 | 1966.49 | 1968.20 | 11874.66 | 1963.878 | 1965.69 | 23314.46 | 1557.87 | 1615.96 | 65828.95 | 1244.54 | 1244.54 | 8653.01 |
| 40-9 | 1987.04 | 234.00 | 1975.34 | 1976.87 | 16197.83 | 1973.49 | 1975.90 | 35874.18 | 1696.878 | 1739.02 | 104785.50 | 1321.46 | 1321.46 | 12709.26 | |
| 40-10 | - | - | 1964.29 | 1966.17 | 21208.34 | 1963.89 | 1965.30 | 24826.35 | 1752.96 | 1772.77 | 249065.05 | 1334.32 | 1334.32 | 14709.26 | |
| 60-8 | 1980.02 | 751.79 | 1965.04 | 1966.42 | 9478.48 | 1962.42 | 1965.57 | 10658.92 | 1535.88 | 1550.93 | 23474.27 | 1360.98 | 1360.98 | 9709.26 | |
| 60-9 | 1985.82 | 779.44 | 1968.92 | 1969.68 | 10425.23 | 1966.95 | 1967.64 | 10708.94 | 1605.11 | 1658.14 | 31665.06 | 1290.76 | 1290.76 | 9614.38 | |
| 大规模 | 60-10 | - | - | 1961.00 | 1963.69 | 22289.53 | 1960.45 | 1961.87 | 24661.47 | 1660.77 | 1706.44 | 35475.36 | 1325.96 | 1325.96 | 14656.98 |
| 70-8 | - | - | 1962.63 | 1965.20 | 10383.73 | 1961.20 | 1963.29 | 13497.30 | 1503.72 | 1550.82 | 25337.16 | 1237.57 | 1237.57 | 12352.23 | |
| 70-9 | - | - | 1968.59 | 1970.64 | 18533.35 | 1968.24 | 1970.18 | 26888.00 | 1539.62 | 1551.00 | 56294.18 | 1239.24 | 1239.24 | 18765.90 | |
| 70-10 | - | - | 1960.34 | 1962.22 | 37647.94 | 1959.28 | 1960.53 | 48018.28 | 1647.87 | 1678.56 | 94100.07 | 1355.89 | 1355.89 | 20566.78 | |
| α1 | α2 | 选择订单ID | 总价格/元 | 总投标价/元 | 总利润/元 | 总客户满意度 | 目标值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.05 | 0.95 | 2,5,9,11,12 | 267 500 | 277 790 | -10 290 | 124 | 550.02 |
| 0.10 | 0.90 | 2,5,10,11,12 | 251 500 | 241 600 | 9900 | 112 | 486.33 |
| 0.15 | 0.85 | 5,6,9,11,12 | 231 500 | 240 250 | -8750 | 112 | 434.66 |
| 0.20 | 0.80 | 4,5,6,9,11,12 | 276 500 | 282 790 | -6290 | 122 | 446.58 |
| 0.25 | 0.75 | 4,5,6,10,11,12 | 260 500 | 245 150 | 15 350 | 110 | 431.23 |
| 0.30 | 0.70 | 3,6,10,11,12 | 268 500 | 241 750 | 26 750 | 91 | 388.47 |
| 0.35 | 0.65 | 3,6,8,11,12 | 299 500 | 272 060 | 27 440 | 90 | 381.26 |
| 0.40 | 0.60 | 3,6,10,11,12 | 268 500 | 239 900 | 28 600 | 91 | 383.00 |
| 0.45 | 0.55 | 3,5,7,11,12 | 302 500 | 268 520 | 33 980 | 93 | 408.96 |
| 0.50 | 0.50 | 1,3,7,12 | 317 000 | 271 300 | 45 700 | 45 | 369.39 |
| 0.55 | 0.45 | 3,6,7,11,12 | 304 500 | 268 070 | 36 430 | 86 | 402.27 |
| 0.60 | 0.40 | 1,6,11,12 | 229 500 | 196 950 | 32 550 | 69 | 344.36 |
| 0.65 | 0.35 | 3,6,7,11,12 | 304 500 | 272 050 | 32 450 | 86 | 373.28 |
| 0.70 | 0.30 | 1,6,11,12 | 229 500 | 195 250 | 34 250 | 69 | 360.55 |
| 0.75 | 0.25 | 1,3,8,12 | 312 000 | 266 890 | 45 110 | 62 | 444.12 |
| 0.80 | 0.20 | 1,6,10,11,12 | 273 500 | 236 350 | 37 150 | 83 | 404.21 |
| 0.85 | 0.15 | 1,6,7,12 | 266 000 | 227 790 | 38 210 | 60 | 412.22 |
| 0.90 | 0.10 | 1,5,7,11,12 | 307 500 | 271 580 | 35 920 | 85 | 391.65 |
| 0.95 | 0.05 | 1,6,7,12 | 266 000 | 228 990 | 37 010 | 60 | 399.71 |
Tab.2 Experimental results
| α1 | α2 | 选择订单ID | 总价格/元 | 总投标价/元 | 总利润/元 | 总客户满意度 | 目标值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.05 | 0.95 | 2,5,9,11,12 | 267 500 | 277 790 | -10 290 | 124 | 550.02 |
| 0.10 | 0.90 | 2,5,10,11,12 | 251 500 | 241 600 | 9900 | 112 | 486.33 |
| 0.15 | 0.85 | 5,6,9,11,12 | 231 500 | 240 250 | -8750 | 112 | 434.66 |
| 0.20 | 0.80 | 4,5,6,9,11,12 | 276 500 | 282 790 | -6290 | 122 | 446.58 |
| 0.25 | 0.75 | 4,5,6,10,11,12 | 260 500 | 245 150 | 15 350 | 110 | 431.23 |
| 0.30 | 0.70 | 3,6,10,11,12 | 268 500 | 241 750 | 26 750 | 91 | 388.47 |
| 0.35 | 0.65 | 3,6,8,11,12 | 299 500 | 272 060 | 27 440 | 90 | 381.26 |
| 0.40 | 0.60 | 3,6,10,11,12 | 268 500 | 239 900 | 28 600 | 91 | 383.00 |
| 0.45 | 0.55 | 3,5,7,11,12 | 302 500 | 268 520 | 33 980 | 93 | 408.96 |
| 0.50 | 0.50 | 1,3,7,12 | 317 000 | 271 300 | 45 700 | 45 | 369.39 |
| 0.55 | 0.45 | 3,6,7,11,12 | 304 500 | 268 070 | 36 430 | 86 | 402.27 |
| 0.60 | 0.40 | 1,6,11,12 | 229 500 | 196 950 | 32 550 | 69 | 344.36 |
| 0.65 | 0.35 | 3,6,7,11,12 | 304 500 | 272 050 | 32 450 | 86 | 373.28 |
| 0.70 | 0.30 | 1,6,11,12 | 229 500 | 195 250 | 34 250 | 69 | 360.55 |
| 0.75 | 0.25 | 1,3,8,12 | 312 000 | 266 890 | 45 110 | 62 | 444.12 |
| 0.80 | 0.20 | 1,6,10,11,12 | 273 500 | 236 350 | 37 150 | 83 | 404.21 |
| 0.85 | 0.15 | 1,6,7,12 | 266 000 | 227 790 | 38 210 | 60 | 412.22 |
| 0.90 | 0.10 | 1,5,7,11,12 | 307 500 | 271 580 | 35 920 | 85 | 391.65 |
| 0.95 | 0.05 | 1,6,7,12 | 266 000 | 228 990 | 37 010 | 60 | 399.71 |
| 目标函数值 | 算法运行时间均值/s | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 最大值 | 均值 | ||
| CBC | - | 1882.18 | 59.69 |
| ALNS | 1824.38 | 1810.38 | 4089.55 |
| 两邻域搜索 | 1738.14 | 1703.28 | 9091.18 |
| 单邻域 1 | 1596.2 | 1564.74 | 26 124.41 |
| 单邻域2 | 774.57 | 774.57 | 5370.41 |
Tab.3 Results for automotive fuel-tank manufacturing case
| 目标函数值 | 算法运行时间均值/s | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 最大值 | 均值 | ||
| CBC | - | 1882.18 | 59.69 |
| ALNS | 1824.38 | 1810.38 | 4089.55 |
| 两邻域搜索 | 1738.14 | 1703.28 | 9091.18 |
| 单邻域 1 | 1596.2 | 1564.74 | 26 124.41 |
| 单邻域2 | 774.57 | 774.57 | 5370.41 |
| 决策方法 | 目标值 | 总利润/元 | 客户总 满意度 | 被接收订单 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 规则1 | 1511.69 | 56 300 | 65 | 2、3、4、5、7、8 |
| 规则2 | 1122.19 | 38 390 | 52 | 1、2、4、7、8 |
| ALNS | 1810.38 | 61 832 | 84 | 1、2、3、4、5、6、7、8 |
Tab.4 Results of OAS decisions under two rule-based
| 决策方法 | 目标值 | 总利润/元 | 客户总 满意度 | 被接收订单 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 规则1 | 1511.69 | 56 300 | 65 | 2、3、4、5、7、8 |
| 规则2 | 1122.19 | 38 390 | 52 | 1、2、4、7、8 |
| ALNS | 1810.38 | 61 832 | 84 | 1、2、3、4、5、6、7、8 |
| [1] | CHAUDHURI A, DATTA P P, FERNANDES K J, et al. Optimal Pricing Strategies for Manufacturing-as-a Service Platforms to Ensure Business Sustainability[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2021, 234: 108065. |
| [2] | 杨涛, 蒋芳. 基于R-GRA的云制造协同服务主体评价研究[J]. 中国机械工程, 2025, 36(9): 2097-2107. |
| YANG Tao, JIANG Fang. Research on Evaluations of Cloud Manufacturing Collaborative Service Entities Based on R-GRA[J]. China Mechanical Engineering, 2025, 36(9): 2097-2107. | |
| [3] | BAO Yuguang, MING Xinguo, ZHANG Xianyu, et al. Platform-based Task Assignment for Social Manufacturing (PBTA4SM): State-of-the-art Review and Future Directions[J]. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 2025, 78: 328-350. |
| [4] | LIU Zhaohui, WANG Zhongjie, YANG Chen. Multi-objective Resource Optimization Scheduling Based on Iterative Double Auction in Cloud Manufacturing[J]. Advances in Manufacturing, 2019, 7(4): 374-388. |
| [5] | 晏鹏宇, 杨柳, 车阿大. 共享制造平台供需匹配与调度研究综述[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2022, 42(3): 811-832. |
| YAN Pengyu, YANG Liu, CHE Ada. Review of Supply-demand Matching and Scheduling in Shared Manufacturing[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2022, 42(3): 811-832. | |
| [6] | 龚小容, 李孝斌, 尹超. 云制造环境下基于贝叶斯网络的机床装备资源优化决策方法[J]. 中国机械工程, 2018, 29(20): 2438-2445. |
| GONG Xiaorong, LI Xiaobin, YIN Chao. Optimization Decision Method of Machine Tool Resources Based on Bayesian Network under Cloud Manufacturing Environments[J]. China Mechanical Engineering, 2018, 29(20): 2438-2445. | |
| [7] | ZHANG Xumei, CAO Duanyang, DAN Bin, et al. The Capacity Matching Problem of the Third-party Shared Manufacturing Platform with Capacity Time Windows and Order Splitting[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2024, 62(17): 6167-6185. |
| [8] | 罗遵昊, 余乐安, 王杜娟, 等. 任务服务时间不确定下基于事件关联的云制造任务调度研究[J/OL]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2025: 10.12011/SETP2024-1746. (2025-05-15). . |
| LUO Zunhao, YU Lean, WANG Dujuan, et al. Event Correlation-based Task Scheduling in Cloud Manufacturing with Uncertain Service Time[J/OL]. Systems Engineering⁃Theory & Practice, 2025: 10.12011/SETP2024-1746. (2025-05-15).. | |
| [9] | 任磊, 任明仑. 基于竞争与协同效应的复杂制造任务一对多双边匹配模型[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2018, 24(5): 1110-1123. |
| REN Lei, REN Minglun. One-to-many Two-sided Matching Method of Wisdom Manufacturing Task Based on Competition and Synergy Effect[J]. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2018, 24(5): 1110-1123. | |
| [10] | LI Baodong, YANG Yu, SU Jiafu, et al. Two-sided Matching Model for Complex Product Manufacturing Tasks Based on Dual Hesitant Fuzzy Preference Information[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2019, 186: 104989. |
| [11] | LIU Peng, ZOU Ying. Two-sided Matching Model of Shared Manufacturing Resources Considering Psychological Behavior of Agents[J]. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2021, 2021(1): 7491913. |
| [12] | 王莉静, 马志鑫, 徐梦杰. 考虑全局满意度的共享制造平台供需双边匹配模型[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2025, 31(11): 4313-4323. |
| WANG Lijing, MA Zhixin, XU Mengjie. Supply-demand Bilateral Matching Model of Shared Manufacturing Platform Considering Global Satisfaction[J]. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2025, 31(11): 4313-4323. | |
| [13] | 彭云龙, 肖勇波. 基于优先权拍卖的产能分配机制研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(12): 105-114. |
| PENG Yunlong, XIAO Yongbo. Capacity Allocation Mechanism Based on Priority Auctions[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2021, 29(12): 105-114. | |
| [14] | CHENG Yuxin, YU Chunxia, XU Suxiu, et al. A Novel Supply-demand Matching Model for Shared Manufacturing Resources[J]. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 2025, 38(10): 1399-1423. |
| [15] | MA Benjiang, ZHOU Zhongmin, BASHIR M F, et al. A Multi-attribute Reverse Auction Model on Margin Bidding[J]. Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research, 2020, 37(6): 2050032. |
| [16] | 王雅娟, 聂炎炎, 王先甲. 基于多属性在线双边拍卖的冷链物流运输服务采购机制[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(7): 253-261. |
| WANG Yajuan, NIE Yanyan, WANG Xianjia. Transportation Service Procurement Mechanism for Cold Chain Logistics Based on Multi-attribute Online Double Auction[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2025, 33(7): 253-261. | |
| [17] | KANG K, TAN B Q, ZHONG R Y. Multi-attribute negotiation mechanism for manufacturing service allocation in smart manufacturing[J]. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 2022, 52: 101523. |
| [18] | YANG Dong, LIU Qidong, LI Jia, et al. Multi-objective Optimization of Service Selection and Scheduling in Cloud Manufacturing Considering Environmental Sustainability[J]. Sustainability, 2020, 12(18): 7733. |
| [19] | LIU Xin, REYNOLDS A C. Gradient-based Multi-objective Optimization with Applications to Waterflooding Optimization[J]. Computational Geosciences, 2016, 20(3): 677-693. |
| [20] | HUANG La, CHEN Jiawei. Weighted Robust Optimality of Convex Optimization Problems with Data Uncertainty[J]. Optimization Letters, 2020, 14(5): 1089-1105. |
| [21] | KUMAR R A, KARTHEEBAN K. Resource Allocation Using Dynamic Pricing Auction Mechanism for Supporting Emergency Demands in Cloud Computing[J]. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, 2021, 158: 213-226. |
| [22] | ZHU Qinghua, TANG Huan, HUANG Jiajie, et al. Task Scheduling for Multi-cloud Computing Subject to Security and Reliability Constraints[J]. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 2021, 8(4): 848-865. |
| [23] | SUN Hao, WU Tingying, BAI Qinyang, et al. Improved Adaptive Large-scale Neighborhood Search Algorithm for Electric Vehicle Routing Problem with Soft Time Windows and Linear Weight-related Discharging[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2025, 280: 127344. |
| [24] | YANG Senyan, ZHANG Ruiyan, MA Ying, et al. Adaptive Large Neighborhood Search Incorporating Mixed-integer Linear Programming for Electric Vehicle Routing Problem with Mobile Charging and Nonlinear Battery Degradation[J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2025, 175: 112988. |
| [25] | HE Pengfei, CHEN Wenchong, WU Qinghua, et al. Capacitated Profitable Tour Problem with Cross-docking[J]. Computers & Operations Research, 2025, 181: 107077. |
| [26] | HE Lei, GUIJT A, de WEERDT M, et al. Order Acceptance and Scheduling with Sequence-dependent Setup Times: a New Memetic Algorithm and Benchmark of the State of the Art[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2019, 138: 106102. |
| [1] | CHEN Bing, LIU Kai, YANG Ting. Non-cooperative Game for Manufacturing Resources Configuration Driven by Job Load Competition [J]. China Mechanical Engineering, 2013, 24(02): 233-239. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||